Bowers
TE · LV vs KC
QuestionableProj pts
18.2pts
market
Warren
TE · IND vs WAS
Proj pts
16.2pts
market
Brock Bowers or Tyler Warren: who should I start in Week 4?
Start Brock Bowers. Bench Tyler Warren. Brock Bowers leads at 18.2. Tyler Warren is the first one out, 2.0 short.
Crowd: started Bowers 98% · Warren 87%
Availability & news
Brock BowersQuestionable
Highlights
Pros
- Alpha TE usage23% target share
- Target volume7.2 targets/g
- Red-zone role1.5 RZ targets/g
Cons
- Tough matchupTough · D+ vs TE
Pros
- Alpha TE usage22% target share
- Favorable matchupFavorable · A- vs TE
- Spike upside20.1 ceiling
Cons
- Below your start line2.0 pts short
Some recent form, opportunity and matchup figures still lean on the 2025 season (not enough games played this season yet).
Week 4 · Updated Tue 6:00 AM ET
Why Brock Bowers
Start Brock Bowers — projects 18.2, a tough matchup vs KC, carrying a questionable tag.
Brock Bowers projects 18.2 points on a 11.0–25.7 range. The matchup grades as tough against KC. Usage: targets / game at 7.2. Track the questionable designation before kickoff. Net: Brock Bowers is start this week.
Working for Bowers: Alpha TE usage (23% target share), Target volume (7.2 targets/g), Red-zone role (1.5 RZ targets/g).
Working against Bowers: Tough matchup (Tough · D+ vs TE).
Where Bowers leads the head-to-head: Projection (18.2 vs 16.2); Floor (11.0 vs 7.8); Ceiling (25.7 vs 20.1); Target share (23% vs 22%); Last 3 avg (17.2 vs 13.1); Last 5 avg (17.7 vs 11.5); Bust rate (8% vs 12%); Targets / game (7.2 vs 6.6); Snap share (86% vs 84%); Touchdown dependence (24% vs 12%).
Why Tyler Warren
Sit Tyler Warren — projects 16.2, a favorable matchup vs WAS, with a rising role.
Tyler Warren projects 16.2 points on a 7.8–20.1 range. The matchup grades as favorable against WAS. Usage: targets / game at 6.6. Net: Tyler Warren is a bench this week.
Working for Warren: Alpha TE usage (22% target share), Favorable matchup (Favorable · A- vs TE), Spike upside (20.1 ceiling).
Working against Warren: Below your start line (2.0 pts short).
Where Warren leads the head-to-head: Matchup grade (recency weighted) (A- vs D+); Implied team total (25.5 vs 21.5); vs season (+2.2 vs +0.6); Consistency (59% vs 35%); Boom rate (24% vs 17%); Red zone targets (23 vs 18); Grade vs TE (recency weighted) (A- vs D+); Implied total (25.5 vs 21.5).
Recent form
Brock Bowers's last 5 games: PPR points 22.3, 14.6, 9.8, 14.3, 27.6 (oldest to newest).
Tyler Warren's last 5 games: PPR points 9.3, 8.6, 10.3, 14.4, 14.7 (oldest to newest).
Bowers has already beaten Warren's 16.2 projection in 2 of his 5; Warren has beaten Bowers's 18.2 in 0 of his 5.
At least 1 of these 5 were played before the 2026 season — the card does not date them.
Matchup
Brock Bowers (LV) faces KC, kickoff Sun 4:25 PM ET. The matchup is rated tough. Betting line: implied team total 21.5, spread +4.5.
Tyler Warren (IND) faces WAS, kickoff Sun 9:30 AM ET. The matchup is rated favorable. Betting line: implied team total 25.5, spread -3.5.
What flips it
Bowers's edge is 2 points (18.2 to 16.2). Warren's ceiling (20.1) clears Bowers's projection, so a big game from Warren flips it. Bowers's floor (11) sits under Warren's projection, so a quiet game from Bowers flips it too. Confidence in the call: moderate.
How to read these numbers
- Confidence in the call
- How clear-cut this start/sit call is — how decisively the player beats the alternative he competes with (for a starter, the best player on your bench; for a bench player, the last one in your lineup), on both projected points and the overlap of their likely ranges. A clear play reads high; a genuine toss-up reads lower. It rates the decision, not the player’s own volatility, and is not a measured accuracy rate.
- Floor
- The 20th percentile of the same simulated distribution.
- Ceiling
- The 90th percentile of the same simulated distribution.
- Matchup grade
- The opponent’s points allowed to this position per game, weighted toward recent games, then graded on a curve across the 32 defenses.
- Implied team total
- The points the betting market expects this team to score, derived from the game total and the spread. Market-derived, not modelled by Nuvela.
- Trend
- The direction of his scoring across the trailing window, classified as heating, steady or cooling.
- Consistency
- The share of his games that landed within a set band of his own per-game average.
- Boom rate
- The share of his games that finished inside the top 12 scorers at his position for that week.
- Bust rate
- The share of his games that came in under half of what he was projected for that week.
- Defense funnel
- Whether the opponent’s rush defense and pass defense are far enough apart to push offenses one way. A gap inside the band reads Neutral.
- Game script projection
- The expected state of the game for his team — favoured, level or trailing — taken from the closing spread.
More start/sit comparisons from this week's PPR projections. Open a pair for the call and the reasoning.