Andrews
TE · BAL vs TEN
Proj pts
12.9pts
market
Loveland
TE · CHI vs NYJ
Proj pts
11.3pts
market
Colston Loveland or Mark Andrews: who should I start in Week 4?
Start Mark Andrews. Bench Colston Loveland. Mark Andrews leads at 12.9. Colston Loveland is the first one out, 1.6 short.
Crowd: started Andrews 42% · Loveland 50%
Highlights
Pros
- High-scoring spot27.5 team total
- Spike upside16.8 ceiling
Cons
- Rotational role62% of snaps
- Shaky floor3.7 floor
Pros
- Favorable matchupFavorable · B+ vs TE
- Spike upside19.1 ceiling
Cons
- Below your start line1.6 pts short
- Rotational role64% of snaps
Some recent form, opportunity and matchup figures still lean on the 2025 season (not enough games played this season yet).
Week 4 · Updated Tue 6:00 AM ET
Why Mark Andrews
Start Mark Andrews — projects 12.9, an even matchup vs TEN, with a rising role.
Mark Andrews projects 12.9 points on a 3.7–16.8 range. The matchup grades as neutral against TEN. Usage: targets / game at 4.1. Net: Mark Andrews is start this week.
Working for Andrews: High-scoring spot (27.5 team total), Spike upside (16.8 ceiling).
Working against Andrews: Rotational role (62% of snaps), Shaky floor (3.7 floor).
Where Andrews leads the head-to-head: Projection (12.9 vs 11.3); Implied team total (27.5 vs 23.5); Last 3 avg (8.4 vs 2.8); vs season (+1.5 vs +0.5); Touchdown dependence (23% vs 22%); Implied total (27.5 vs 23.5).
Why Colston Loveland
Sit Colston Loveland — projects 11.3, a favorable matchup vs NYJ, but the role is cooling.
Colston Loveland projects 11.3 points on a 5.9–19.1 range. The matchup grades as favorable against NYJ. Usage: targets / game at 5.1. Net: Colston Loveland is a bench this week.
Working for Loveland: Favorable matchup (Favorable · B+ vs TE), Spike upside (19.1 ceiling).
Working against Loveland: Below your start line (1.6 pts short), Rotational role (64% of snaps).
Where Loveland leads the head-to-head: Floor (5.9 vs 3.7); Ceiling (19.1 vs 16.8); Matchup grade (recency weighted) (B+ vs B); Last 5 avg (11.0 vs 7.1); Consistency (23% vs 16%); Boom rate (20% vs 18%); Bust rate (27% vs 35%); Targets / game (5.1 vs 4.1); Snap share (64% vs 62%); Red zone targets (19 vs 15); Grade vs TE (recency weighted) (B+ vs B).
Recent form
Mark Andrews's last 5 games: PPR points 6.8, 3.4, 8.9, 10.9, 5.4 (oldest to newest).
Colston Loveland's last 5 games: PPR points 21.4, 25.1, 0, 1.3, 7.1 (oldest to newest).
Andrews has already beaten Loveland's 11.3 projection in 0 of his 5; Loveland has beaten Andrews's 12.9 in 2 of his 5.
At least 1 of these 5 were played before the 2026 season — the card does not date them.
Matchup
Mark Andrews (BAL) faces TEN, kickoff Sun 1:00 PM ET. The matchup is rated neutral. Betting line: implied team total 27.5, spread -11.5.
Colston Loveland (CHI) faces NYJ, kickoff Sun 1:00 PM ET. The matchup is rated favorable. Betting line: implied team total 23.5, spread -3.5.
What flips it
Andrews's edge is 1.6 points (12.9 to 11.3). Loveland's ceiling (19.1) clears Andrews's projection, so a big game from Loveland flips it. Andrews's floor (3.7) sits under Loveland's projection, so a quiet game from Andrews flips it too. Confidence in the call: moderate.
How to read these numbers
- Confidence in the call
- How clear-cut this start/sit call is — how decisively the player beats the alternative he competes with (for a starter, the best player on your bench; for a bench player, the last one in your lineup), on both projected points and the overlap of their likely ranges. A clear play reads high; a genuine toss-up reads lower. It rates the decision, not the player’s own volatility, and is not a measured accuracy rate.
- Floor
- The 20th percentile of the same simulated distribution.
- Ceiling
- The 90th percentile of the same simulated distribution.
- Matchup grade
- The opponent’s points allowed to this position per game, weighted toward recent games, then graded on a curve across the 32 defenses.
- Implied team total
- The points the betting market expects this team to score, derived from the game total and the spread. Market-derived, not modelled by Nuvela.
- Trend
- The direction of his scoring across the trailing window, classified as heating, steady or cooling.
- Consistency
- The share of his games that landed within a set band of his own per-game average.
- Boom rate
- The share of his games that finished inside the top 12 scorers at his position for that week.
- Bust rate
- The share of his games that came in under half of what he was projected for that week.
- Defense funnel
- Whether the opponent’s rush defense and pass defense are far enough apart to push offenses one way. A gap inside the band reads Neutral.
- Game script projection
- The expected state of the game for his team — favoured, level or trailing — taken from the closing spread.
More start/sit comparisons from this week's PPR projections. Open a pair for the call and the reasoning.