Murray
QB · MIN vs MIA
Proj pts
16.2pts
market
Jones
QB · IND vs WAS
Proj pts
16.2pts
market
Daniel Jones or Kyler Murray: who should I start in Week 4?
Start Kyler Murray. Bench Daniel Jones. Kyler Murray leads at 16.2. Daniel Jones is the first one out, 0.0 short.
Crowd: started Murray 33% · Jones 32%
Murray and Jones are effectively tied on projection — Murray gets the start on the tie-break.
Highlights
Pros
- Rushing floor5.8 rush att/g
- Favorable matchupFavorable · B+ vs QB
- Reliable90% consistency
Pros
- Favorable matchupFavorable · A vs QB
- Reliable75% consistency
Cons
- Shaky floor12.9 floor
Some recent form, opportunity and matchup figures still lean on the 2025 season (not enough games played this season yet).
Week 4 · Updated Tue 6:00 AM ET
Why Kyler Murray
Start Kyler Murray — projects 16.2, a favorable matchup vs MIA, but the role is cooling.
Kyler Murray projects 16.2 points on a 14.6–20.0 range. The matchup grades as favorable against MIA. Usage: pass attempts / game at 32.2. Net: Kyler Murray is start this week.
Working for Murray: Rushing floor (5.8 rush att/g), Favorable matchup (Favorable · B+ vs QB), Reliable (90% consistency).
Where Murray leads the head-to-head: Floor (14.6 vs 12.9); Pass attempts (32.2 vs 29.5); Last 5 avg (11.1 vs 9.5); vs season (-4.1 vs -4.9); Consistency (90% vs 75%); Pass attempts / game (32.2 vs 29.5); Completions / game (22.0 vs 20.1); Rush attempts / game (5.8 vs 3.5); Rush yards / game (34.6 vs 12.6); Rushing production share (30% vs 20%).
Why Daniel Jones
Sit Daniel Jones — projects 16.2, a favorable matchup vs WAS, but the role is cooling.
Daniel Jones projects 16.2 points on a 12.9–22.2 range. The matchup grades as favorable against WAS. Usage: pass attempts / game at 29.5. Net: Daniel Jones is a bench this week.
Working for Jones: Favorable matchup (Favorable · A vs QB), Reliable (75% consistency).
Working against Jones: Shaky floor (12.9 floor).
Where Jones leads the head-to-head: Ceiling (22.2 vs 20.0); Matchup grade (recency weighted) (A vs B+); Implied team total (25.5 vs 24.5); Last 3 avg (9.4 vs 8.4); Boom rate (8% vs 0%); Yards per attempt (8.1 vs 6.0); Touchdown rate (5% vs 4%); Grade vs QB (recency weighted) (A vs B+); Implied total (25.5 vs 24.5).
Recent form
Kyler Murray's last 5 games: PPR points 14.1, 16.1, 15.3, -0.4, 10.4 (oldest to newest).
Daniel Jones's last 5 games: PPR points 18.1, 0.8, 9, 11.4, 7.9 (oldest to newest).
Murray has already beaten Jones's 16.2 projection in 0 of his 5; Jones has beaten Murray's 16.2 in 1 of his 5.
At least 1 of these 5 were played before the 2026 season — the card does not date them.
Matchup
Kyler Murray (MIN) faces MIA, kickoff Sun 4:05 PM ET. The matchup is rated favorable. Betting line: implied team total 24.5, spread -10.5.
Daniel Jones (IND) faces WAS, kickoff Sun 9:30 AM ET. The matchup is rated favorable. Betting line: implied team total 25.5, spread -3.5.
What flips it
Murray and Jones are level on projection (16.2). Jones's ceiling (22.2) clears Murray's projection, so a big game from Jones flips it. Murray's floor (14.6) sits under Jones's projection, so a quiet game from Murray flips it too. Confidence in the call: lower.
How to read these numbers
- Confidence in the call
- How clear-cut this start/sit call is — how decisively the player beats the alternative he competes with (for a starter, the best player on your bench; for a bench player, the last one in your lineup), on both projected points and the overlap of their likely ranges. A clear play reads high; a genuine toss-up reads lower. It rates the decision, not the player’s own volatility, and is not a measured accuracy rate.
- Floor
- The 20th percentile of the same simulated distribution.
- Ceiling
- The 90th percentile of the same simulated distribution.
- Matchup grade
- The opponent’s points allowed to this position per game, weighted toward recent games, then graded on a curve across the 32 defenses.
- Implied team total
- The points the betting market expects this team to score, derived from the game total and the spread. Market-derived, not modelled by Nuvela.
- Trend
- The direction of his scoring across the trailing window, classified as heating, steady or cooling.
- Consistency
- The share of his games that landed within a set band of his own per-game average.
- Boom rate
- The share of his games that finished inside the top 12 scorers at his position for that week.
- Bust rate
- The share of his games that came in under half of what he was projected for that week.
- Defense funnel
- Whether the opponent’s rush defense and pass defense are far enough apart to push offenses one way. A gap inside the band reads Neutral.
- Game script projection
- The expected state of the game for his team — favoured, level or trailing — taken from the closing spread.
More start/sit comparisons from this week's PPR projections. Open a pair for the call and the reasoning.