Andrews
TE · BAL vs TEN
Proj pts
12.9pts
market
Henry
TE · NE vs BUF
Proj pts
11.2pts
market
Hunter Henry or Mark Andrews: who should I start in Week 4?
Start Mark Andrews. Bench Hunter Henry. Mark Andrews leads at 12.9. Hunter Henry is the first one out, 1.7 short.
Crowd: started Andrews 42%
Highlights
Pros
- High-scoring spot27.5 team total
- Spike upside16.8 ceiling
Cons
- Rotational role62% of snaps
- Shaky floor3.7 floor
Pros
- Spike upside14.9 ceiling
Cons
- Below your start line1.7 pts short
- Tough matchupTough · F vs TE
Some recent form, opportunity and matchup figures still lean on the 2025 season (not enough games played this season yet).
Week 4 · Updated Tue 6:00 AM ET
Why Mark Andrews
Start Mark Andrews — projects 12.9, an even matchup vs TEN, with a rising role.
Mark Andrews projects 12.9 points on a 3.7–16.8 range. The matchup grades as neutral against TEN. Usage: targets / game at 4.1. Net: Mark Andrews is start this week.
Working for Andrews: High-scoring spot (27.5 team total), Spike upside (16.8 ceiling).
Working against Andrews: Rotational role (62% of snaps), Shaky floor (3.7 floor).
Where Andrews leads the head-to-head: Projection (12.9 vs 11.2); Ceiling (16.8 vs 14.9); Matchup grade (recency weighted) (B vs F); Implied team total (27.5 vs 20.8); Last 3 avg (8.4 vs 4.7); vs season (+1.5 vs -2.4); Boom rate (18% vs 12%); Grade vs TE (recency weighted) (B vs F); Implied total (27.5 vs 20.8).
Why Hunter Henry
Sit Hunter Henry — projects 11.2, a tough matchup vs BUF, but the role is cooling.
Hunter Henry projects 11.2 points on a 6.6–14.9 range. The matchup grades as tough against BUF. Usage: targets / game at 5.1. Net: Hunter Henry is a bench this week.
Working for Henry: Spike upside (14.9 ceiling).
Working against Henry: Below your start line (1.7 pts short), Tough matchup (Tough · F vs TE).
Where Henry leads the head-to-head: Floor (6.6 vs 3.7); Target share (18% vs 17%); Last 5 avg (7.7 vs 7.1); Consistency (33% vs 16%); Bust rate (18% vs 35%); Targets / game (5.1 vs 4.1); Snap share (79% vs 62%); Red zone targets (24 vs 15); Touchdown dependence (24% vs 23%).
Recent form
Mark Andrews's last 5 games: PPR points 6.8, 3.4, 8.9, 10.9, 5.4 (oldest to newest).
Hunter Henry's last 5 games: PPR points 13.9, 10.6, 5.6, 7, 1.5 (oldest to newest).
Andrews has already beaten Henry's 11.2 projection in 0 of his 5; Henry has beaten Andrews's 12.9 in 1 of his 5.
At least 1 of these 5 were played before the 2026 season — the card does not date them.
Matchup
Mark Andrews (BAL) faces TEN, kickoff Sun 1:00 PM ET. The matchup is rated neutral. Betting line: implied team total 27.5, spread -11.5.
Hunter Henry (NE) faces BUF, kickoff Sun 1:00 PM ET. The matchup is rated tough. Betting line: implied team total 20.8, spread +7.0.
What flips it
Andrews's edge is 1.7 points (12.9 to 11.2). Henry's ceiling (14.9) clears Andrews's projection, so a big game from Henry flips it. Andrews's floor (3.7) sits under Henry's projection, so a quiet game from Andrews flips it too. Confidence in the call: moderate.
How to read these numbers
- Confidence in the call
- How clear-cut this start/sit call is — how decisively the player beats the alternative he competes with (for a starter, the best player on your bench; for a bench player, the last one in your lineup), on both projected points and the overlap of their likely ranges. A clear play reads high; a genuine toss-up reads lower. It rates the decision, not the player’s own volatility, and is not a measured accuracy rate.
- Floor
- The 20th percentile of the same simulated distribution.
- Ceiling
- The 90th percentile of the same simulated distribution.
- Matchup grade
- The opponent’s points allowed to this position per game, weighted toward recent games, then graded on a curve across the 32 defenses.
- Implied team total
- The points the betting market expects this team to score, derived from the game total and the spread. Market-derived, not modelled by Nuvela.
- Trend
- The direction of his scoring across the trailing window, classified as heating, steady or cooling.
- Consistency
- The share of his games that landed within a set band of his own per-game average.
- Boom rate
- The share of his games that finished inside the top 12 scorers at his position for that week.
- Bust rate
- The share of his games that came in under half of what he was projected for that week.
- Defense funnel
- Whether the opponent’s rush defense and pass defense are far enough apart to push offenses one way. A gap inside the band reads Neutral.
- Game script projection
- The expected state of the game for his team — favoured, level or trailing — taken from the closing spread.
More start/sit comparisons from this week's PPR projections. Open a pair for the call and the reasoning.