Goff
QB · DET vs CAR
Proj pts
16.5pts
market
Stafford
QB · LA vs PHI
Proj pts
16.2pts
market
Jared Goff or Matthew Stafford: who should I start in Week 4?
Start Jared Goff. Bench Matthew Stafford. Jared Goff leads at 16.5. Matthew Stafford is the first one out, 0.3 short.
Crowd: started Goff 79% · Stafford 66%
Highlights
Pros
- High-scoring spot27.0 team total
- High floor16.4 floor
- Heating up21.9 last 3
Cons
- Tough matchupTough · D+ vs QB
Pros
- Spike upside26.9 ceiling
- Reliable69% consistency
Cons
- Shaky floor12.0 floor
Some recent form, opportunity and matchup figures still lean on the 2025 season (not enough games played this season yet).
Week 4 · Updated Tue 6:00 AM ET
Why Jared Goff
Start Jared Goff — projects 16.5, a tough matchup vs CAR, with a rising role.
Jared Goff projects 16.5 points on a 16.4–26.1 range. The matchup grades as tough against CAR. Usage: pass attempts / game at 34.0. Net: Jared Goff is start this week.
Working for Goff: High-scoring spot (27.0 team total), High floor (16.4 floor), Heating up (21.9 last 3).
Working against Goff: Tough matchup (Tough · D+ vs QB).
Where Goff leads the head-to-head: Projection (16.5 vs 16.2); Floor (16.4 vs 12.0); Implied team total (27.0 vs 23.3); Last 3 avg (21.9 vs 17.3); Boom rate (12% vs 0%); Completions / game (23.1 vs 22.8); Rush yards / game (2.6 vs 0.1); Rushing production share (2% vs 0%); Implied total (27.0 vs 23.3).
Why Matthew Stafford
Sit Matthew Stafford — projects 16.2, an even matchup vs PHI, but the role is cooling.
Matthew Stafford projects 16.2 points on a 12.0–26.9 range. The matchup grades as neutral against PHI. Usage: pass attempts / game at 35.1. Net: Matthew Stafford is a bench this week.
Working for Stafford: Spike upside (26.9 ceiling), Reliable (69% consistency).
Working against Stafford: Shaky floor (12.0 floor).
Where Stafford leads the head-to-head: Ceiling (26.9 vs 26.1); Pass attempts (35.1 vs 34.0); Matchup grade (recency weighted) (C vs D+); Last 5 avg (18.5 vs 16.6); vs season (-1.9 vs -2.5); Consistency (69% vs 58%); Pass attempts / game (35.1 vs 34.0); Touchdown rate (8% vs 6%); Rush attempts / game (1.7 vs 1.1); Grade vs QB (recency weighted) (C vs D+).
Recent form
Jared Goff's last 5 games: PPR points 2.1, 15.2, 16.4, 29.8, 19.4 (oldest to newest).
Matthew Stafford's last 5 games: PPR points 13.8, 26.7, 4.1, 27, 20.9 (oldest to newest).
Goff has already beaten Stafford's 16.2 projection in 3 of his 5; Stafford has beaten Goff's 16.5 in 3 of his 5.
At least 1 of these 5 were played before the 2026 season — the card does not date them.
Matchup
Jared Goff (DET) faces CAR, kickoff Sun 8:20 PM ET. The matchup is rated tough. Betting line: implied team total 27.0, spread -3.5.
Matthew Stafford (LA) faces PHI, kickoff Sun 1:00 PM ET. The matchup is rated neutral. Betting line: implied team total 23.3, spread -3.0.
What flips it
Goff's edge is 0.3 points (16.5 to 16.2). Stafford's ceiling (26.9) clears Goff's projection, so a big game from Stafford flips it. Confidence in the call: lower.
How to read these numbers
- Confidence in the call
- How clear-cut this start/sit call is — how decisively the player beats the alternative he competes with (for a starter, the best player on your bench; for a bench player, the last one in your lineup), on both projected points and the overlap of their likely ranges. A clear play reads high; a genuine toss-up reads lower. It rates the decision, not the player’s own volatility, and is not a measured accuracy rate.
- Floor
- The 20th percentile of the same simulated distribution.
- Ceiling
- The 90th percentile of the same simulated distribution.
- Matchup grade
- The opponent’s points allowed to this position per game, weighted toward recent games, then graded on a curve across the 32 defenses.
- Implied team total
- The points the betting market expects this team to score, derived from the game total and the spread. Market-derived, not modelled by Nuvela.
- Trend
- The direction of his scoring across the trailing window, classified as heating, steady or cooling.
- Consistency
- The share of his games that landed within a set band of his own per-game average.
- Boom rate
- The share of his games that finished inside the top 12 scorers at his position for that week.
- Bust rate
- The share of his games that came in under half of what he was projected for that week.
- Defense funnel
- Whether the opponent’s rush defense and pass defense are far enough apart to push offenses one way. A gap inside the band reads Neutral.
- Game script projection
- The expected state of the game for his team — favoured, level or trailing — taken from the closing spread.
More start/sit comparisons from this week's PPR projections. Open a pair for the call and the reasoning.