Woods
TE · NYJ vs LV
Kickoff Sun 1:00 PM ET
Projected points1.1ptsUsage estimate
Kallerup
TE · SEA vs CHI
Kickoff Mon 8:15 PM ET
Projected points1.1ptsUsage estimate
Toss-up
Bench
Jelani Woods or Nick Kallerup: Who Should I Start in Week 8?
Toss-up. Jelani Woods gets the nod over Nick Kallerup.
- Ahead by
- Level
- with Kallerup
- Confidence
- Lower
- Toss-up
Case for Kallerup
The case for Kallerup is an offense expected to score more (24.8 points to 23.5).
Flips if
Start Nick Kallerup instead if you want an offense expected to score more (24.8 points to 23.5).
Risk
The risk: Woods has been held under 6 points in 5 straight games.
Highlights
WoodsToss-upTE · NYJ vs LVUsually 1.1+0.0pts this week
Helps him
- +1.4ptspaceMost players at his position produce more than he has, so we expect him to bounce back some.
- LVvs TEsEdgeLV is the 5th softest defense for tight ends.
Hurts him
- −1.1ptsroleHe’s expected to play fewer snaps this week than he has lately.
- 3%targetsHe draws only 3% of his team’s targets.
- 0.7per gameHe sees only 0.7 targets a game.
KallerupFirst outTE · SEA vs CHIUsually 0.0+1.1pts this week
Helps him
- +1.5ptspaceMost players at his position produce more than he has, so we expect him to bounce back some.
Hurts him
- 1%targetsHe draws only 1% of his team’s targets.
- 0.1per gameHe sees only 0.1 targets a game.
Points are what each line adds to or takes off his usual week. EdgeFrom the game around him.
Stat comparison
Every player you picked, stat by stat, most important first.
Stat
Scoring
ProjectionWoods: 1.1Kallerup: 1.1
Projected team pointsWoods: 23.5Kallerup: 24.8 (best)
Red zone targetsper gameWoods: 0.1Kallerup: 0.1
Role
Snap shareWoods: 30%Kallerup: 24%
Usage worthptsWoods: 1.2 (best)Kallerup: 0.3
Target shareWoods: 3%Kallerup: 1%
Targets / gameWoods: 0.7Kallerup: 0.1
Air yards shareWoods: 2%Kallerup: 0.4%
Vacated targets this weekWoods: 0.5Kallerup: 1.0 (best)
RZ target shareWoods: 4%Kallerup: 3%
Inside 10 target shareWoods: 0%Kallerup: 6%
Catch rateWoods: 80%Kallerup: 1 target
Usage worth vs scoredWoods: Earned by usage 1.2Scored 1.1Kallerup: Earned by usage 0.3Scored 0.2
WOPRWoods: 0.05Kallerup: 0.02
Range
FloorWoods: 0.4Kallerup: 0.6 (best)
CeilingWoods: 2.1 (best)Kallerup: 1.9
Points from TDssteadier when lowerWoods: 0%Kallerup: 0%
Big weeks (15+ pts)Woods: 0%Kallerup: 0%
Dud weeks (under 5 pts)lower is betterWoods: 100%Kallerup: 100%
SteadinessWoods: Volatile±1.5 pts · 4 gamesKallerup: Avg 0 or below
Matchup
Matchup gradevs his position · 2026, 7 gmWoods: A- (best)Kallerup: C
Game scriptWoods: Expected to leadKallerup: Expected to lead (best)
Opp takeaways / gamelower is betterWoods: 1.7Kallerup: 1.4 (best)
Defense funnelWoods: NeutralKallerup: Neutral
Opp pass yds allowedWoods: 22nd (soft) (best)Kallerup: 20th (average)
Starting QBWoods: Smith (Active)Kallerup: Darnold (Active)
Opp defender outWoods: Johnson (DE)Kallerup: None listed
Roof / surfaceturfWoods: OpenKallerup: Open
Rest / scheduleWoods: NormalKallerup: Normal
Opp paceWoods: 9th (fast)Kallerup: 1st (fast) (best)
Opp deep targets allowed / gameWoods: 0.4 (best)11th (average)Kallerup: 0.38th (tough)
Opp catch rate allowedWoods: 82% (best)31st (soft)Kallerup: 74%22nd (soft)
Form
Last 3 avgWoods: 0.9 (best)Kallerup: 0.0
Last 5 avgWoods: 1.6 (best)Kallerup: 0.0
vs seasonWoods: −0.2 (Cooling)Kallerup: +0.1 (Rising)
Yards per route runWoods: 1.34Kallerup: 0
Receiving aDOTWoods: 4.8Kallerup: 1 target
Target share trendWoods: SteadyKallerup: Cooling
Crowd
Nuvela position ranklower is betterWoods: TE73 (best)Kallerup: TE75
Deciding on someone else?
Choose 2 to 5 players for any week.