Diggs
WR · WAS vs IND
Proj pts
13.3pts
market
Hollins
WR · NE vs BUF
Proj pts
12.1pts
market
Mack Hollins or Stefon Diggs: who should I start in Week 4?
Start Stefon Diggs. Bench Mack Hollins. Stefon Diggs leads at 13.3. Mack Hollins is the first one out, 1.2 short.
Crowd: started Diggs 65% · Hollins 29%
Highlights
Pros
- Favorable matchupFavorable · A vs WR
- Spike upside22.0 ceiling
Cons
- Rotational snaps54% of snaps
Cons
- Thin volume4.6 targets/g
- Tough matchupTough · D vs WR
Some recent form, opportunity and matchup figures still lean on the 2025 season (not enough games played this season yet).
Week 4 · Updated Tue 6:00 AM ET
Why Stefon Diggs
Start Stefon Diggs — projects 13.3, a favorable matchup vs IND, with a rising role.
Stefon Diggs projects 13.3 points on a 6.8–22.0 range. The matchup grades as favorable against IND. Usage: targets / game at 6.0. Net: Stefon Diggs is start this week.
Working for Diggs: Favorable matchup (Favorable · A vs WR), Spike upside (22.0 ceiling).
Working against Diggs: Rotational snaps (54% of snaps).
Where Diggs leads the head-to-head: Projection (13.3 vs 12.1); Ceiling (22.0 vs 14.5); Target share (22% vs 16%); Matchup grade (recency weighted) (A vs D); Implied team total (22.0 vs 20.8); Last 3 avg (14.8 vs 9.2); Last 5 avg (14.8 vs 10.4); vs season (+1.7 vs +0.6); Consistency (47% vs 45%); Boom rate (24% vs 21%); Targets / game (6.0 vs 4.6); Red zone targets (13 vs 6); Grade vs WR (recency weighted) (A vs D); Implied total (22.0 vs 20.8).
Why Mack Hollins
Sit Mack Hollins — projects 12.1, a tough matchup vs BUF.
Mack Hollins projects 12.1 points on a 6.8–14.5 range. The matchup grades as tough against BUF. Usage: targets / game at 4.6. Net: Mack Hollins is a bench this week.
Working against Hollins: Thin volume (4.6 targets/g), Tough matchup (Tough · D vs WR).
Where Hollins leads the head-to-head: Bust rate (14% vs 29%); Snap share (68% vs 54%).
Recent form
Stefon Diggs's last 5 games: PPR points 22.1, 7.3, 15.5, 21.7, 7.3 (oldest to newest).
Mack Hollins's last 4 games: PPR points 13.9, 9.1, 3.8, 14.7 (oldest to newest).
Diggs has already beaten Hollins's 12.1 projection in 3 of his 5; Hollins has beaten Diggs's 13.3 in 2 of his 4.
At least 1 of these 5 were played before the 2026 season — the card does not date them.
Matchup
Stefon Diggs (WAS) faces IND, kickoff Sun 9:30 AM ET. The matchup is rated favorable. Betting line: implied team total 22.0, spread +3.5.
Mack Hollins (NE) faces BUF, kickoff Sun 1:00 PM ET. The matchup is rated tough. Betting line: implied team total 20.8, spread +7.0.
What flips it
Diggs's edge is 1.2 points (13.3 to 12.1). Hollins's ceiling (14.5) clears Diggs's projection, so a big game from Hollins flips it. Diggs's floor (6.8) sits under Hollins's projection, so a quiet game from Diggs flips it too. Confidence in the call: moderate.
How to read these numbers
- Confidence in the call
- How clear-cut this start/sit call is — how decisively the player beats the alternative he competes with (for a starter, the best player on your bench; for a bench player, the last one in your lineup), on both projected points and the overlap of their likely ranges. A clear play reads high; a genuine toss-up reads lower. It rates the decision, not the player’s own volatility, and is not a measured accuracy rate.
- Floor
- The 20th percentile of the same simulated distribution.
- Ceiling
- The 90th percentile of the same simulated distribution.
- Matchup grade
- The opponent’s points allowed to this position per game, weighted toward recent games, then graded on a curve across the 32 defenses.
- Implied team total
- The points the betting market expects this team to score, derived from the game total and the spread. Market-derived, not modelled by Nuvela.
- Trend
- The direction of his scoring across the trailing window, classified as heating, steady or cooling.
- Consistency
- The share of his games that landed within a set band of his own per-game average.
- Boom rate
- The share of his games that finished inside the top 12 scorers at his position for that week.
- Bust rate
- The share of his games that came in under half of what he was projected for that week.
- Defense funnel
- Whether the opponent’s rush defense and pass defense are far enough apart to push offenses one way. A gap inside the band reads Neutral.
- Game script projection
- The expected state of the game for his team — favoured, level or trailing — taken from the closing spread.
More start/sit comparisons from this week's PPR projections. Open a pair for the call and the reasoning.