Johnston
WR · LAC vs SEA
Proj pts
9.7pts
market
Pittman
WR · PIT vs CLE
QuestionableProj pts
9.7pts
market
Michael Pittman or Quentin Johnston: who should I start in Week 4?
Start Quentin Johnston. Bench Michael Pittman. Quentin Johnston leads at 9.7. Michael Pittman is the first one out, 0.0 short.
Johnston and Pittman are effectively tied on projection — Johnston gets the start on the tie-break.
Availability & news
Michael PittmanQuestionable
Highlights
Cons
- Low team total17.8 team total
- Tough matchupTough · D vs WR
Pros
- Every-down role86% of snaps
Cons
- Tough matchupTough · D- vs WR
- Shaky floor3.6 floor
Some recent form, opportunity and matchup figures still lean on the 2025 season (not enough games played this season yet).
Week 4 · Updated Tue 6:00 AM ET
Why Quentin Johnston
Start Quentin Johnston — projects 9.7, a tough matchup vs SEA, but the role is cooling.
Quentin Johnston projects 9.7 points on a 3.2–14.1 range. The matchup grades as tough against SEA. Usage: targets / game at 6.5. Net: Quentin Johnston is start this week.
Working against Johnston: Low team total (17.8 team total), Tough matchup (Tough · D vs WR).
Where Johnston leads the head-to-head: Ceiling (14.1 vs 12.0); Matchup grade (recency weighted) (D vs D-); Last 5 avg (7.0 vs 5.3); vs season (-1.0 vs -1.7); Consistency (46% vs 39%); Bust rate (15% vs 35%); Grade vs WR (recency weighted) (D vs D-).
Why Michael Pittman
Sit Michael Pittman — projects 9.7, a tough matchup vs CLE, but the role is cooling, carrying a questionable tag.
Michael Pittman projects 9.7 points on a 3.6–12.0 range. The matchup grades as tough against CLE. Usage: targets / game at 6.5. Track the questionable designation before kickoff. Net: Michael Pittman is a bench this week.
Working for Pittman: Every-down role (86% of snaps).
Working against Pittman: Tough matchup (Tough · D- vs WR), Shaky floor (3.6 floor).
Where Pittman leads the head-to-head: Floor (3.6 vs 3.2); Target share (21% vs 20%); Implied team total (20.5 vs 17.8); Last 3 avg (5.2 vs 4.4); Boom rate (29% vs 23%); Snap share (86% vs 79%); Red zone targets (18 vs 15); Implied total (20.5 vs 17.8).
Recent form
Quentin Johnston's last 4 games: PPR points 14.8, 3.7, 2.4, 7 (oldest to newest).
Michael Pittman's last 5 games: PPR points 7.2, 3.6, 3.1, 8.8, 3.6 (oldest to newest).
Johnston has already beaten Pittman's 9.7 projection in 1 of his 4; Pittman has beaten Johnston's 9.7 in 0 of his 5.
At least 1 of these 5 were played before the 2026 season — the card does not date them.
Matchup
Quentin Johnston (LAC) faces SEA, kickoff Sun 4:25 PM ET. The matchup is rated tough. Betting line: implied team total 17.8, spread +7.0.
Michael Pittman (PIT) faces CLE, kickoff Thu 8:15 PM ET. The matchup is rated tough. Betting line: implied team total 20.5, spread -2.5.
What flips it
Johnston and Pittman are level on projection (9.7). Pittman's ceiling (12) clears Johnston's projection, so a big game from Pittman flips it. Johnston's floor (3.2) sits under Pittman's projection, so a quiet game from Johnston flips it too. Confidence in the call: lower.
How to read these numbers
- Confidence in the call
- How clear-cut this start/sit call is — how decisively the player beats the alternative he competes with (for a starter, the best player on your bench; for a bench player, the last one in your lineup), on both projected points and the overlap of their likely ranges. A clear play reads high; a genuine toss-up reads lower. It rates the decision, not the player’s own volatility, and is not a measured accuracy rate.
- Floor
- The 20th percentile of the same simulated distribution.
- Ceiling
- The 90th percentile of the same simulated distribution.
- Matchup grade
- The opponent’s points allowed to this position per game, weighted toward recent games, then graded on a curve across the 32 defenses.
- Implied team total
- The points the betting market expects this team to score, derived from the game total and the spread. Market-derived, not modelled by Nuvela.
- Trend
- The direction of his scoring across the trailing window, classified as heating, steady or cooling.
- Consistency
- The share of his games that landed within a set band of his own per-game average.
- Boom rate
- The share of his games that finished inside the top 12 scorers at his position for that week.
- Bust rate
- The share of his games that came in under half of what he was projected for that week.
- Defense funnel
- Whether the opponent’s rush defense and pass defense are far enough apart to push offenses one way. A gap inside the band reads Neutral.
- Game script projection
- The expected state of the game for his team — favoured, level or trailing — taken from the closing spread.
More start/sit comparisons from this week's PPR projections. Open a pair for the call and the reasoning.