Montgomery
RB · HOU vs DAL
Proj pts
17.1pts
market
Allen
RB · NYJ vs CHI
Proj pts
16.6pts
market
Braelon Allen or David Montgomery: who should I start in Week 4?
Start David Montgomery. Bench Braelon Allen. David Montgomery leads at 17.1. Braelon Allen is the first one out, 0.5 short.
Crowd: started Montgomery 72% · Allen 49%
Highlights
Pros
- Run-funnel matchupRun-funnel vs RB
- Spike upside24.3 ceiling
Cons
- Committee back22% of touches
- Shaky floor6.6 floor
Pros
- Reliable99% consistency
Cons
- Committee back3% of touches
- Negative game scriptTrailing
Some recent form, opportunity and matchup figures still lean on the 2025 season (not enough games played this season yet).
Week 4 · Updated Tue 6:00 AM ET
Why David Montgomery
Start David Montgomery — projects 17.1, a run-funnel matchup vs DAL, with a rising role.
David Montgomery projects 17.1 points on a 6.6–24.3 range. The matchup grades as run-funnel against DAL. Usage: carries / game at 9.3. Net: David Montgomery is start this week.
Working for Montgomery: Run-funnel matchup (Run-funnel vs RB), Spike upside (24.3 ceiling).
Working against Montgomery: Committee back (22% of touches), Shaky floor (6.6 floor).
Where Montgomery leads the head-to-head: Projection (17.1 vs 16.6); Floor (6.6 vs 4.3); Ceiling (24.3 vs 18.2); Touch share (22% vs 3%); Opportunity score (8.4 vs 4.0); Matchup grade (recency weighted) (A- vs C); Implied team total (25.5 vs 20.0); Last 3 avg (13.4 vs 5.7); Last 5 avg (10.5 vs 4.9); vs season (+0.8 vs +0.7); Boom rate (12% vs 0%); Carries / game (9.3 vs 4.5); Touches / game (10.7 vs 5.0); Target share (6% vs 3%); Opportunity score (exp pts) (8.4 vs 4.0); Yards per carry (4.5 vs 4.2); Snap share (37% vs 23%); Goal line carries (16 vs 1); Red zone carries (34 vs 7); Grade vs RB (recency weighted) (A- vs C); Implied total (25.5 vs 20.0).
Why Braelon Allen
Sit Braelon Allen — projects 16.6, an even matchup vs CHI, with a rising role.
Braelon Allen projects 16.6 points on a 4.3–18.2 range. The matchup grades as neutral against CHI. Usage: carries / game at 4.5. Net: Braelon Allen is a bench this week.
Working for Allen: Reliable (99% consistency).
Working against Allen: Committee back (3% of touches), Negative game script (Trailing).
Where Allen leads the head-to-head: Consistency (99% vs 38%); Bust rate (0% vs 12%).
Recent form
David Montgomery's last 5 games: PPR points 6, 6.5, 28.9, 4.4, 6.8 (oldest to newest).
Braelon Allen's last 5 games: PPR points 6.7, 0.6, 4, 8.5, 4.7 (oldest to newest).
Montgomery has already beaten Allen's 16.6 projection in 1 of his 5; Allen has beaten Montgomery's 17.1 in 0 of his 5.
At least 1 of these 5 were played before the 2026 season — the card does not date them.
Matchup
David Montgomery (HOU) faces DAL, kickoff Sun 1:00 PM ET. The matchup is rated run-funnel. Betting line: implied team total 25.5, spread -2.5.
Braelon Allen (NYJ) faces CHI, kickoff Sun 1:00 PM ET. The matchup is rated neutral. Betting line: implied team total 20.0, spread +3.5.
What flips it
Montgomery's edge is 0.5 points (17.1 to 16.6). Allen's ceiling (18.2) clears Montgomery's projection, so a big game from Allen flips it. Montgomery's floor (6.6) sits under Allen's projection, so a quiet game from Montgomery flips it too. Confidence in the call: lower.
How to read these numbers
- Confidence in the call
- How clear-cut this start/sit call is — how decisively the player beats the alternative he competes with (for a starter, the best player on your bench; for a bench player, the last one in your lineup), on both projected points and the overlap of their likely ranges. A clear play reads high; a genuine toss-up reads lower. It rates the decision, not the player’s own volatility, and is not a measured accuracy rate.
- Floor
- The 20th percentile of the same simulated distribution.
- Ceiling
- The 90th percentile of the same simulated distribution.
- Opportunity score
- Expected points from projected volume alone, before any efficiency of this player’s own: each projected touch and target valued at the positional average for the scoring format.
- Matchup grade
- The opponent’s points allowed to this position per game, weighted toward recent games, then graded on a curve across the 32 defenses.
- Implied team total
- The points the betting market expects this team to score, derived from the game total and the spread. Market-derived, not modelled by Nuvela.
- Trend
- The direction of his scoring across the trailing window, classified as heating, steady or cooling.
- Touch share trend
- The same classification, measured on his share of team touches rather than on his points.
- Consistency
- The share of his games that landed within a set band of his own per-game average.
- Boom rate
- The share of his games that finished inside the top 12 scorers at his position for that week.
- Bust rate
- The share of his games that came in under half of what he was projected for that week.
- Vacated touches
- Carries and targets belonging to team-mates who are ruled out, on IR, or listed as non-participants for this week, taken at their recent per-game rate.
- Defense funnel
- Whether the opponent’s rush defense and pass defense are far enough apart to push offenses one way. A gap inside the band reads Neutral.
- Game script projection
- The expected state of the game for his team — favoured, level or trailing — taken from the closing spread.
More start/sit comparisons from this week's PPR projections. Open a pair for the call and the reasoning.