Wilson
WR · NYJ vs CHI
Proj pts
20.4pts
market
Lamb
WR · DAL vs HOU
Proj pts
19.4pts
market
CeeDee Lamb or Garrett Wilson: who should I start in Week 4?
Start Garrett Wilson. Bench CeeDee Lamb. Garrett Wilson leads at 20.4. CeeDee Lamb is the first one out, 1.0 short.
Crowd: started Wilson 97% · Lamb 100%
Highlights
Pros
- Alpha target share35% target share
- Favorable matchupFavorable · A- vs WR
- High floor13.0 floor
Pros
- Alpha target share25% target share
- Target volume9.0 targets/g
- High floor12.8 floor
Cons
- Tough matchupTough · D- vs WR
Some recent form, opportunity and matchup figures still lean on the 2025 season (not enough games played this season yet).
Week 4 · Updated Tue 6:00 AM ET
Why Garrett Wilson
Start Garrett Wilson — projects 20.4, a favorable matchup vs CHI, with a rising role.
Garrett Wilson projects 20.4 points on a 13.0–23.7 range. The matchup grades as favorable against CHI. Usage: targets / game at 8.4. Net: Garrett Wilson is start this week.
Working for Wilson: Alpha target share (35% target share), Favorable matchup (Favorable · A- vs WR), High floor (13.0 floor).
Where Wilson leads the head-to-head: Projection (20.4 vs 19.4); Floor (13.0 vs 12.8); Ceiling (23.7 vs 23.4); Target share (35% vs 25%); Matchup grade (recency weighted) (A- vs D-); Boom rate (29% vs 8%); Snap share (87% vs 78%); Grade vs WR (recency weighted) (A- vs D-).
Why CeeDee Lamb
Sit CeeDee Lamb — projects 19.4, a tough matchup vs HOU, with a rising role.
CeeDee Lamb projects 19.4 points on a 12.8–23.4 range. The matchup grades as tough against HOU. Usage: targets / game at 9.0. Net: CeeDee Lamb is a bench this week.
Working for Lamb: Alpha target share (25% target share), Target volume (9.0 targets/g), High floor (12.8 floor).
Working against Lamb: Tough matchup (Tough · D- vs WR).
Where Lamb leads the head-to-head: Implied team total (23.0 vs 20.0); Last 3 avg (23.6 vs 19.1); Last 5 avg (18.1 vs 12.5); vs season (+1.2 vs -3.5); Consistency (63% vs 41%); Bust rate (8% vs 29%); Targets / game (9.0 vs 8.4); Red zone targets (17 vs 5); Implied total (23.0 vs 20.0).
Recent form
Garrett Wilson's last 5 games: PPR points 4.3, 1, 13.9, 16.7, 26.7 (oldest to newest).
CeeDee Lamb's last 4 games: PPR points 1.4, 15.4, 35.3, 20.2 (oldest to newest).
Wilson has already beaten Lamb's 19.4 projection in 1 of his 5; Lamb has beaten Wilson's 20.4 in 1 of his 4.
At least 1 of these 5 were played before the 2026 season — the card does not date them.
Matchup
Garrett Wilson (NYJ) faces CHI, kickoff Sun 1:00 PM ET. The matchup is rated favorable. Betting line: implied team total 20.0, spread +3.5.
CeeDee Lamb (DAL) faces HOU, kickoff Sun 1:00 PM ET. The matchup is rated tough. Betting line: implied team total 23.0, spread +2.5.
What flips it
Wilson's edge is 1 points (20.4 to 19.4). Lamb's ceiling (23.4) clears Wilson's projection, so a big game from Lamb flips it. Wilson's floor (13) sits under Lamb's projection, so a quiet game from Wilson flips it too. Confidence in the call: moderate.
How to read these numbers
- Confidence in the call
- How clear-cut this start/sit call is — how decisively the player beats the alternative he competes with (for a starter, the best player on your bench; for a bench player, the last one in your lineup), on both projected points and the overlap of their likely ranges. A clear play reads high; a genuine toss-up reads lower. It rates the decision, not the player’s own volatility, and is not a measured accuracy rate.
- Floor
- The 20th percentile of the same simulated distribution.
- Ceiling
- The 90th percentile of the same simulated distribution.
- Matchup grade
- The opponent’s points allowed to this position per game, weighted toward recent games, then graded on a curve across the 32 defenses.
- Implied team total
- The points the betting market expects this team to score, derived from the game total and the spread. Market-derived, not modelled by Nuvela.
- Trend
- The direction of his scoring across the trailing window, classified as heating, steady or cooling.
- Consistency
- The share of his games that landed within a set band of his own per-game average.
- Boom rate
- The share of his games that finished inside the top 12 scorers at his position for that week.
- Bust rate
- The share of his games that came in under half of what he was projected for that week.
- Defense funnel
- Whether the opponent’s rush defense and pass defense are far enough apart to push offenses one way. A gap inside the band reads Neutral.
- Game script projection
- The expected state of the game for his team — favoured, level or trailing — taken from the closing spread.
More start/sit comparisons from this week's PPR projections. Open a pair for the call and the reasoning.