Kincaid
TE · BUF vs NE
Proj pts
15.5pts
market
Andrews
TE · BAL vs TEN
Proj pts
12.9pts
market
Dalton Kincaid or Mark Andrews: who should I start in Week 4?
Start Dalton Kincaid. Bench Mark Andrews. Dalton Kincaid leads at 15.5. Mark Andrews is the first one out, 2.6 short.
Crowd: started Kincaid 76% · Andrews 42%
Highlights
Pros
- High-scoring spot27.8 team total
- Spike upside21.9 ceiling
- Heating up14.8 last 3
Cons
- Rotational role37% of snaps
Pros
- High-scoring spot27.5 team total
- Spike upside16.8 ceiling
Cons
- Below your start line2.6 pts short
- Rotational role62% of snaps
Some recent form, opportunity and matchup figures still lean on the 2025 season (not enough games played this season yet).
Week 4 · Updated Tue 6:00 AM ET
Why Dalton Kincaid
Start Dalton Kincaid — projects 15.5, an even matchup vs NE, with a rising role.
Dalton Kincaid projects 15.5 points on a 5.8–21.9 range. The matchup grades as neutral against NE. Usage: targets / game at 4.1. Net: Dalton Kincaid is start this week.
Working for Kincaid: High-scoring spot (27.8 team total), Spike upside (21.9 ceiling), Heating up (14.8 last 3).
Working against Kincaid: Rotational role (37% of snaps).
Where Kincaid leads the head-to-head: Projection (15.5 vs 12.9); Floor (5.8 vs 3.7); Ceiling (21.9 vs 16.8); Implied team total (27.8 vs 27.5); Last 3 avg (14.8 vs 8.4); Last 5 avg (10.4 vs 7.1); Consistency (45% vs 16%); Boom rate (20% vs 18%); Bust rate (20% vs 35%); Touchdown dependence (24% vs 23%); Implied total (27.8 vs 27.5).
Why Mark Andrews
Sit Mark Andrews — projects 12.9, an even matchup vs TEN, with a rising role.
Mark Andrews projects 12.9 points on a 3.7–16.8 range. The matchup grades as neutral against TEN. Usage: targets / game at 4.1. Net: Mark Andrews is a bench this week.
Working for Andrews: High-scoring spot (27.5 team total), Spike upside (16.8 ceiling).
Working against Andrews: Below your start line (2.6 pts short), Rotational role (62% of snaps).
Where Andrews leads the head-to-head: Target share (17% vs 15%); Matchup grade (recency weighted) (B vs B-); vs season (+1.5 vs +0.0); Snap share (62% vs 37%); Red zone targets (15 vs 11); Grade vs TE (recency weighted) (B vs B-).
Recent form
Dalton Kincaid's last 5 games: PPR points 0, 7.8, 18, 22.5, 3.8 (oldest to newest).
Mark Andrews's last 5 games: PPR points 6.8, 3.4, 8.9, 10.9, 5.4 (oldest to newest).
Kincaid has already beaten Andrews's 12.9 projection in 2 of his 5; Andrews has beaten Kincaid's 15.5 in 0 of his 5.
At least 1 of these 5 were played before the 2026 season — the card does not date them.
Matchup
Dalton Kincaid (BUF) faces NE, kickoff Sun 1:00 PM ET. The matchup is rated neutral. Betting line: implied team total 27.8, spread -7.0.
Mark Andrews (BAL) faces TEN, kickoff Sun 1:00 PM ET. The matchup is rated neutral. Betting line: implied team total 27.5, spread -11.5.
What flips it
Kincaid's edge is 2.6 points (15.5 to 12.9). Andrews's ceiling (16.8) clears Kincaid's projection, so a big game from Andrews flips it. Kincaid's floor (5.8) sits under Andrews's projection, so a quiet game from Kincaid flips it too. Confidence in the call: moderate.
How to read these numbers
- Confidence in the call
- How clear-cut this start/sit call is — how decisively the player beats the alternative he competes with (for a starter, the best player on your bench; for a bench player, the last one in your lineup), on both projected points and the overlap of their likely ranges. A clear play reads high; a genuine toss-up reads lower. It rates the decision, not the player’s own volatility, and is not a measured accuracy rate.
- Floor
- The 20th percentile of the same simulated distribution.
- Ceiling
- The 90th percentile of the same simulated distribution.
- Matchup grade
- The opponent’s points allowed to this position per game, weighted toward recent games, then graded on a curve across the 32 defenses.
- Implied team total
- The points the betting market expects this team to score, derived from the game total and the spread. Market-derived, not modelled by Nuvela.
- Trend
- The direction of his scoring across the trailing window, classified as heating, steady or cooling.
- Consistency
- The share of his games that landed within a set band of his own per-game average.
- Boom rate
- The share of his games that finished inside the top 12 scorers at his position for that week.
- Bust rate
- The share of his games that came in under half of what he was projected for that week.
- Defense funnel
- Whether the opponent’s rush defense and pass defense are far enough apart to push offenses one way. A gap inside the band reads Neutral.
- Game script projection
- The expected state of the game for his team — favoured, level or trailing — taken from the closing spread.
More start/sit comparisons from this week's PPR projections. Open a pair for the call and the reasoning.