Maye
QB · NE vs BUF
Proj pts
17.9pts
market
Lawrence
QB · JAX vs CIN
Proj pts
17.8pts
market
Drake Maye or Trevor Lawrence: who should I start in Week 4?
Start Drake Maye. Bench Trevor Lawrence. Drake Maye leads at 17.9. Trevor Lawrence is the first one out, 0.1 short.
Crowd: started Maye 34% · Lawrence 73%
Highlights
Pros
- Rushing floor6.1 rush att/g
- Reliable73% consistency
Cons
- Tough matchupTough · D- vs QB
- Cooling off7.2 last 3
Pros
- Favorable matchupFavorable · B+ vs QB
- Spike upside29.4 ceiling
Some recent form, opportunity and matchup figures still lean on the 2025 season (not enough games played this season yet).
Week 4 · Updated Tue 6:00 AM ET
Why Drake Maye
Start Drake Maye — projects 17.9, a tough matchup vs BUF, but the role is cooling.
Drake Maye projects 17.9 points on a 13.8–23.9 range. The matchup grades as tough against BUF. Usage: pass attempts / game at 28.9. Net: Drake Maye is start this week.
Working for Maye: Rushing floor (6.1 rush att/g), Reliable (73% consistency).
Working against Maye: Tough matchup (Tough · D- vs QB), Cooling off (7.2 last 3).
Where Maye leads the head-to-head: Projection (17.9 vs 17.8); vs season (-2.8 vs -3.5); Consistency (73% vs 57%); Bust rate (0% vs 12%); Completions / game (20.8 vs 20.1); Yards per attempt (8.9 vs 7.2); Touchdown rate (6% vs 5%); Rush attempts / game (6.1 vs 4.8); Rush yards / game (26.5 vs 21.1).
Why Trevor Lawrence
Sit Trevor Lawrence — projects 17.8, a favorable matchup vs CIN, but the role is cooling.
Trevor Lawrence projects 17.8 points on a 15.1–29.4 range. The matchup grades as favorable against CIN. Usage: pass attempts / game at 32.9. Net: Trevor Lawrence is a bench this week.
Working for Lawrence: Favorable matchup (Favorable · B+ vs QB), Spike upside (29.4 ceiling).
Where Lawrence leads the head-to-head: Floor (15.1 vs 13.8); Ceiling (29.4 vs 23.9); Pass attempts (32.9 vs 28.9); Matchup grade (recency weighted) (B+ vs D-); Implied team total (24.5 vs 20.8); Last 3 avg (17.3 vs 7.2); Last 5 avg (19.7 vs 14.0); Boom rate (12% vs 6%); Pass attempts / game (32.9 vs 28.9); Rushing production share (26% vs 19%); Grade vs QB (recency weighted) (B+ vs D-); Implied total (24.5 vs 20.8).
Recent form
Drake Maye's last 5 games: PPR points 32.4, 15.7, 9.8, 8, 3.8 (oldest to newest).
Trevor Lawrence's last 5 games: PPR points 23.1, 23.3, 26.1, 6.2, 19.8 (oldest to newest).
Maye has already beaten Lawrence's 17.8 projection in 1 of his 5; Lawrence has beaten Maye's 17.9 in 4 of his 5.
At least 1 of these 5 were played before the 2026 season — the card does not date them.
Matchup
Drake Maye (NE) faces BUF, kickoff Sun 1:00 PM ET. The matchup is rated tough. Betting line: implied team total 20.8, spread +7.0.
Trevor Lawrence (JAX) faces CIN, kickoff Sun 1:00 PM ET. The matchup is rated favorable. Betting line: implied team total 24.5, spread +2.5.
What flips it
Maye's edge is 0.1 points (17.9 to 17.8). Lawrence's ceiling (29.4) clears Maye's projection, so a big game from Lawrence flips it. Maye's floor (13.8) sits under Lawrence's projection, so a quiet game from Maye flips it too. Confidence in the call: lower.
How to read these numbers
- Confidence in the call
- How clear-cut this start/sit call is — how decisively the player beats the alternative he competes with (for a starter, the best player on your bench; for a bench player, the last one in your lineup), on both projected points and the overlap of their likely ranges. A clear play reads high; a genuine toss-up reads lower. It rates the decision, not the player’s own volatility, and is not a measured accuracy rate.
- Floor
- The 20th percentile of the same simulated distribution.
- Ceiling
- The 90th percentile of the same simulated distribution.
- Matchup grade
- The opponent’s points allowed to this position per game, weighted toward recent games, then graded on a curve across the 32 defenses.
- Implied team total
- The points the betting market expects this team to score, derived from the game total and the spread. Market-derived, not modelled by Nuvela.
- Trend
- The direction of his scoring across the trailing window, classified as heating, steady or cooling.
- Consistency
- The share of his games that landed within a set band of his own per-game average.
- Boom rate
- The share of his games that finished inside the top 12 scorers at his position for that week.
- Bust rate
- The share of his games that came in under half of what he was projected for that week.
- Defense funnel
- Whether the opponent’s rush defense and pass defense are far enough apart to push offenses one way. A gap inside the band reads Neutral.
- Game script projection
- The expected state of the game for his team — favoured, level or trailing — taken from the closing spread.
More start/sit comparisons from this week's PPR projections. Open a pair for the call and the reasoning.