Engram
TE · DEN vs SF
Proj pts
7.7pts
market
Fant
TE · NO vs ATL
QuestionableProj pts
6.9pts
market
Evan Engram or Noah Fant: who should I start in Week 4?
Toss-up: lean Evan Engram over Noah Fant by 0.8. Evan Engram leads at 7.7. Noah Fant is the first one out, 0.8 short.
Crowd: 35% of managers started Fant.
Availability & news
Noah FantQuestionable
Fant was limited in practice Thursday due to an abdominal injury.(rotowire, Oct 1, 2026)
Highlights
Pros
- Favorable matchupFavorable · B+ vs TE
Cons
- Rotational role42% of snaps
- Shaky floor2.8 floor
Pros
- Spike upside14.8 ceiling
Cons
- Low TE usage9% target share
- Thin volume3.2 targets/g
Some recent form, opportunity and matchup figures still lean on the 2025 season (not enough games played this season yet).
Week 4 · Updated Tue 29 Sep, 6:00 AM ET
The widest gap between them, in proportion, is touchdown dependence: Engram 6%, Fant 24%.
Fant (Questionable): “Fant was limited in practice Thursday due to an abdominal injury.” — RotoWire, Oct 1, 2026.
Latest game on the card: Engram 0 (PPR points).
Why Evan Engram
Start Evan Engram — projects 7.7, a favorable matchup vs SF.
Evan Engram projects 7.7 points on a 2.8–11.7 range. The matchup grades as favorable against SF. Usage: targets / game at 4.8. Net: start Evan Engram this week.
Working for Engram: Favorable matchup (Favorable · B+ vs TE).
Working against Engram: Rotational role (42% of snaps), Shaky floor (2.8 floor).
Where Engram leads the head-to-head: Projection (7.7 vs 6.9); Floor (2.8 vs 1.6); Target share (14% vs 9%); Matchup grade (recency weighted) (B+ vs D-); Consistency (41% vs 40%); Targets / game (4.8 vs 3.2); Snap share (42% vs 40%); Red zone targets (12 vs 4).
Why Noah Fant
Sit Noah Fant — projects 6.9, a tough matchup vs ATL, with a rising role.
Noah Fant projects 6.9 points on a 1.6–14.8 range. The matchup grades as tough against ATL. Usage: targets / game at 3.2. Net: bench Noah Fant this week.
Working for Fant: Spike upside (14.8 ceiling).
Working against Fant: Low TE usage (9% target share), Thin volume (3.2 targets/g).
Where Fant leads the head-to-head: Ceiling (14.8 vs 11.7); Implied team total (25.8 vs 22.3); Last 3 avg (10.9 vs 5.7); Last 5 avg (10.9 vs 6.1); vs season (+6.2 vs -0.1); Boom rate (27% vs 19%); Bust rate (27% vs 31%); Touchdown dependence (24% vs 6%).
Recent form
Evan Engram's last 5 games: PPR points 6.1, 7.5, 14.3, 2.7, 0 (oldest to newest).
Noah Fant's last 3 games: PPR points 0, 13.3, 19.3 (low to high; the card does not say which came first).
Engram has already beaten Fant's 6.9 projection in 2 of his 5; Fant has beaten Engram's 7.7 in 2 of his 3.
At least 1 of these 5 games was played before the 2026 season.
Matchup
Evan Engram (DEN) faces SF, kickoff Sun, Oct 4, 4:25 PM ET. The matchup is rated favorable. Betting line: implied team total 22.3, spread +3.0.
Noah Fant (NO) faces ATL, kickoff Mon, Oct 5, 8:15 PM ET. The matchup is rated tough. Betting line: implied team total 25.8, spread -3.0.
What flips it
Engram's edge is 0.8 points (7.7 to 6.9). Fant's ceiling (14.8) clears Engram's projection, so a big game from Fant flips it. Engram's floor (2.8) sits under Fant's projection, so a quiet game from Engram flips it too. Confidence in the call: moderate.
More start/sit comparisons from this week's PPR projections. Open a pair for the call and the reasoning.
This week's toughest calls
- Colston Loveland or Hunter Henry11.3 · 11.2
- Juwan Johnson or Tucker Kraft12.3 · 12.2
- AJ Barner or Hunter Henry11.2 · 11.2
- Isaiah Likely or Tucker Kraft12.2 · 12.2
- Brenton Strange or Colston Loveland11.4 · 11.3
- AJ Barner or Colston Loveland11.2 · 11.3
- More TE start/sit calls (tight ends this week)