Fannin
TE · CLE vs PIT
Proj pts
13.2pts
market
Andrews
TE · BAL vs TEN
Proj pts
12.9pts
market
Harold Fannin Jr. or Mark Andrews: who should I start in Week 4?
Start Harold Fannin Jr. Bench Mark Andrews. Harold Fannin Jr. leads at 13.2. Mark Andrews is the first one out, 0.3 short.
Crowd: started Fannin 75% · Andrews 42%
Highlights
Pros
- Alpha TE usage22% target share
- Favorable matchupFavorable · A+ vs TE
- High floor9.2 floor
Cons
- Low team total18.0 team total
Pros
- High-scoring spot27.5 team total
- Spike upside16.8 ceiling
Cons
- Rotational role62% of snaps
- Shaky floor3.7 floor
Some recent form, opportunity and matchup figures still lean on the 2025 season (not enough games played this season yet).
Week 4 · Updated Tue 6:00 AM ET
Why Harold Fannin Jr.
Start Harold Fannin Jr. — projects 13.2, a favorable matchup vs PIT.
Harold Fannin Jr. projects 13.2 points on a 9.2–23.3 range. The matchup grades as favorable against PIT. Usage: targets / game at 6.7. Net: Harold Fannin Jr. is start this week.
Working for Fannin: Alpha TE usage (22% target share), Favorable matchup (Favorable · A+ vs TE), High floor (9.2 floor).
Working against Fannin: Low team total (18.0 team total).
Where Fannin leads the head-to-head: Projection (13.2 vs 12.9); Floor (9.2 vs 3.7); Ceiling (23.3 vs 16.8); Target share (22% vs 17%); Matchup grade (recency weighted) (A+ vs B); Last 3 avg (12.9 vs 8.4); Last 5 avg (13.9 vs 7.1); Consistency (51% vs 16%); Boom rate (20% vs 18%); Bust rate (20% vs 35%); Targets / game (6.7 vs 4.1); Snap share (76% vs 62%); Grade vs TE (recency weighted) (A+ vs B).
Why Mark Andrews
Sit Mark Andrews — projects 12.9, an even matchup vs TEN, with a rising role.
Mark Andrews projects 12.9 points on a 3.7–16.8 range. The matchup grades as neutral against TEN. Usage: targets / game at 4.1. Net: Mark Andrews is a bench this week.
Working for Andrews: High-scoring spot (27.5 team total), Spike upside (16.8 ceiling).
Working against Andrews: Rotational role (62% of snaps), Shaky floor (3.7 floor).
Where Andrews leads the head-to-head: Implied team total (27.5 vs 18.0); vs season (+1.5 vs +0.8); Red zone targets (15 vs 11); Touchdown dependence (23% vs 19%); Implied total (27.5 vs 18.0).
Recent form
Harold Fannin Jr.'s last 5 games: PPR points 20, 11, 4.1, 10.4, 24.1 (oldest to newest).
Mark Andrews's last 5 games: PPR points 6.8, 3.4, 8.9, 10.9, 5.4 (oldest to newest).
Fannin has already beaten Andrews's 12.9 projection in 2 of his 5; Andrews has beaten Fannin's 13.2 in 0 of his 5.
At least 1 of these 5 were played before the 2026 season — the card does not date them.
Matchup
Harold Fannin Jr. (CLE) faces PIT, kickoff Thu 8:15 PM ET. The matchup is rated favorable. Betting line: implied team total 18.0, spread +2.5.
Mark Andrews (BAL) faces TEN, kickoff Sun 1:00 PM ET. The matchup is rated neutral. Betting line: implied team total 27.5, spread -11.5.
What flips it
Fannin's edge is 0.3 points (13.2 to 12.9). Andrews's ceiling (16.8) clears Fannin's projection, so a big game from Andrews flips it. Fannin's floor (9.2) sits under Andrews's projection, so a quiet game from Fannin flips it too. Confidence in the call: high.
How to read these numbers
- Confidence in the call
- How clear-cut this start/sit call is — how decisively the player beats the alternative he competes with (for a starter, the best player on your bench; for a bench player, the last one in your lineup), on both projected points and the overlap of their likely ranges. A clear play reads high; a genuine toss-up reads lower. It rates the decision, not the player’s own volatility, and is not a measured accuracy rate.
- Floor
- The 20th percentile of the same simulated distribution.
- Ceiling
- The 90th percentile of the same simulated distribution.
- Matchup grade
- The opponent’s points allowed to this position per game, weighted toward recent games, then graded on a curve across the 32 defenses.
- Implied team total
- The points the betting market expects this team to score, derived from the game total and the spread. Market-derived, not modelled by Nuvela.
- Trend
- The direction of his scoring across the trailing window, classified as heating, steady or cooling.
- Consistency
- The share of his games that landed within a set band of his own per-game average.
- Boom rate
- The share of his games that finished inside the top 12 scorers at his position for that week.
- Bust rate
- The share of his games that came in under half of what he was projected for that week.
- Defense funnel
- Whether the opponent’s rush defense and pass defense are far enough apart to push offenses one way. A gap inside the band reads Neutral.
- Game script projection
- The expected state of the game for his team — favoured, level or trailing — taken from the closing spread.
More start/sit comparisons from this week's PPR projections. Open a pair for the call and the reasoning.