Johnston
WR · LAC vs SEA
Proj pts
9.7pts
market
Addison
WR · MIN vs MIA
Proj pts
9.5pts
opportunity
Jordan Addison or Quentin Johnston: who should I start in Week 4?
Start Quentin Johnston. Bench Jordan Addison. Quentin Johnston leads at 9.7. Jordan Addison is the first one out, 0.2 short.
Crowd: started Addison 58%
Highlights
Cons
- Low team total17.8 team total
- Tough matchupTough · D vs WR
Pros
- Every-down role85% of snaps
Cons
- Shaky floor3.4 floor
Some recent form, opportunity and matchup figures still lean on the 2025 season (not enough games played this season yet).
Week 4 · Updated Tue 6:00 AM ET
Why Quentin Johnston
Start Quentin Johnston — projects 9.7, a tough matchup vs SEA, but the role is cooling.
Quentin Johnston projects 9.7 points on a 3.2–14.1 range. The matchup grades as tough against SEA. Usage: targets / game at 6.5. Net: Quentin Johnston is start this week.
Working against Johnston: Low team total (17.8 team total), Tough matchup (Tough · D vs WR).
Where Johnston leads the head-to-head: Projection (9.7 vs 9.5); Ceiling (14.1 vs 11.7); Target share (20% vs 18%); Consistency (46% vs 42%); Boom rate (23% vs 21%); Bust rate (15% vs 21%); Targets / game (6.5 vs 5.6); Red zone targets (15 vs 13).
Why Jordan Addison
Sit Jordan Addison — projects 9.5, an even matchup vs MIA, with a rising role.
Jordan Addison projects 9.5 points on a 3.4–11.7 range. The matchup grades as neutral against MIA. Usage: targets / game at 5.6. Net: Jordan Addison is a bench this week.
Working for Addison: Every-down role (85% of snaps).
Working against Addison: Shaky floor (3.4 floor).
Where Addison leads the head-to-head: Floor (3.4 vs 3.2); Matchup grade (recency weighted) (C vs D); Implied team total (24.5 vs 17.8); Last 3 avg (8.0 vs 4.4); Last 5 avg (7.7 vs 7.0); vs season (+0.7 vs -1.0); Snap share (85% vs 79%); Grade vs WR (recency weighted) (C vs D); Implied total (24.5 vs 17.8).
Recent form
Quentin Johnston's last 4 games: PPR points 14.8, 3.7, 2.4, 7 (oldest to newest).
Jordan Addison's last 5 games: PPR points 12.5, 1.8, 0, 4.1, 20 (oldest to newest).
Johnston has already beaten Addison's 9.5 projection in 1 of his 4; Addison has beaten Johnston's 9.7 in 2 of his 5.
At least 1 of these 5 were played before the 2026 season — the card does not date them.
Matchup
Quentin Johnston (LAC) faces SEA, kickoff Sun 4:25 PM ET. The matchup is rated tough. Betting line: implied team total 17.8, spread +7.0.
Jordan Addison (MIN) faces MIA, kickoff Sun 4:05 PM ET. The matchup is rated neutral. Betting line: implied team total 24.5, spread -10.5.
What flips it
Johnston's edge is 0.2 points (9.7 to 9.5). Addison's ceiling (11.7) clears Johnston's projection, so a big game from Addison flips it. Johnston's floor (3.2) sits under Addison's projection, so a quiet game from Johnston flips it too. Confidence in the call: lower.
How to read these numbers
- Confidence in the call
- How clear-cut this start/sit call is — how decisively the player beats the alternative he competes with (for a starter, the best player on your bench; for a bench player, the last one in your lineup), on both projected points and the overlap of their likely ranges. A clear play reads high; a genuine toss-up reads lower. It rates the decision, not the player’s own volatility, and is not a measured accuracy rate.
- Floor
- The 20th percentile of the same simulated distribution.
- Ceiling
- The 90th percentile of the same simulated distribution.
- Matchup grade
- The opponent’s points allowed to this position per game, weighted toward recent games, then graded on a curve across the 32 defenses.
- Implied team total
- The points the betting market expects this team to score, derived from the game total and the spread. Market-derived, not modelled by Nuvela.
- Trend
- The direction of his scoring across the trailing window, classified as heating, steady or cooling.
- Consistency
- The share of his games that landed within a set band of his own per-game average.
- Boom rate
- The share of his games that finished inside the top 12 scorers at his position for that week.
- Bust rate
- The share of his games that came in under half of what he was projected for that week.
- Defense funnel
- Whether the opponent’s rush defense and pass defense are far enough apart to push offenses one way. A gap inside the band reads Neutral.
- Game script projection
- The expected state of the game for his team — favoured, level or trailing — taken from the closing spread.
More start/sit comparisons from this week's PPR projections. Open a pair for the call and the reasoning.