Fant
TE · NO vs ATL
QuestionableProj pts
6.4pts
market
Ertz
TE · PHI vs LA
Proj pts
6.2pts
market
Noah Fant or Zach Ertz: who should I start in Week 4?
Toss-up: lean Noah Fant over Zach Ertz by 0.2. Noah Fant leads at 6.4. Zach Ertz is the first one out, 0.2 short.
Crowd: 38% of managers started Fant.
Availability & news
Noah FantQuestionable
Fant was limited in practice Thursday due to an abdominal injury.(rotowire, Oct 1, 2026)
Zach Ertz
Ertz reverted to the Eagles' practice squad Tuesday, per the NFL's transaction log.(rotowire, Sep 29, 2026)
Highlights
Pros
- Spike upside14.8 ceiling
Cons
- Low TE usage9% target share
- Thin volume3.2 targets/g
Pros
- Spike upside15.0 ceiling
Cons
- Low team total19.5 team total
Some recent form, opportunity and matchup figures still lean on the 2025 season (not enough games played this season yet).
Week 4 · Updated Tue 29 Sep, 6:00 AM ET
The widest gap between them, in proportion, is red zone targets: Fant 4, Ertz 9.
Fant (Questionable): “Fant was limited in practice Thursday due to an abdominal injury.” — RotoWire, Oct 1, 2026.
Ertz: “Ertz reverted to the Eagles' practice squad Tuesday, per the NFL's transaction log.” — RotoWire, Sep 29, 2026.
Latest game on the card: Ertz 1.9 (PPR points).
Why Noah Fant
Start Noah Fant — projects 6.4, a tough matchup vs ATL, with a rising role.
Noah Fant projects 6.4 points on a 1.6–14.8 range. The matchup grades as tough against ATL. Usage: targets / game at 3.2. Net: start Noah Fant this week.
Working for Fant: Spike upside (14.8 ceiling).
Working against Fant: Low TE usage (9% target share), Thin volume (3.2 targets/g).
Where Fant leads the head-to-head: Projection (6.4 vs 6.2); Implied team total (25.0 vs 19.5); Last 3 avg (10.9 vs 8.2); Last 5 avg (10.9 vs 8.4); vs season (+6.2 vs -0.2); Boom rate (27% vs 23%); Touchdown dependence (24% vs 19%).
Why Zach Ertz
Sit Zach Ertz — projects 6.2, an even matchup vs LA.
Zach Ertz projects 6.2 points on a 5.2–15.0 range. The matchup grades as neutral against LA. Usage: targets / game at 5.5. Net: bench Zach Ertz this week.
Working for Ertz: Spike upside (15.0 ceiling).
Working against Ertz: Low team total (19.5 team total).
Where Ertz leads the head-to-head: Floor (5.2 vs 1.6); Ceiling (15.0 vs 14.8); Target share (19% vs 9%); Matchup grade (recency weighted) (C+ vs D-); Consistency (41% vs 40%); Bust rate (15% vs 27%); Targets / game (5.5 vs 3.2); Snap share (66% vs 40%); Red zone targets (9 vs 4).
Recent form
Noah Fant's last 3 games: PPR points 0, 13.3, 19.3 (low to high; the card does not say which came first).
Zach Ertz's last 5 games: PPR points 9.4, 8.2, 20.6, 2.1, 1.9 (oldest to newest).
Fant has already beaten Ertz's 6.2 projection in 2 of his 3; Ertz has beaten Fant's 6.4 in 3 of his 5.
At least 1 of these 5 games was played before the 2026 season.
Matchup
Noah Fant (NO) faces ATL, kickoff Mon, Oct 5, 8:15 PM ET. The matchup is rated tough. Betting line: implied team total 25.0, spread -2.5.
Zach Ertz (PHI) faces LA, kickoff Sun, Oct 4, 1:00 PM ET. The matchup is rated neutral. Betting line: implied team total 19.5, spread +3.5.
What flips it
Fant's edge is 0.2 points (6.4 to 6.2). Ertz's ceiling (15) clears Fant's projection, so a big game from Ertz flips it. Fant's floor (1.6) sits under Ertz's projection, so a quiet game from Fant flips it too. Confidence in the call: lower.
More start/sit comparisons from this week's PPR projections. Open a pair for the call and the reasoning.
This week's toughest calls
- Brenton Strange or Colston Loveland11.5 · 11.4
- Mark Andrews or Tucker Kraft12.9 · 13.0
- Dalton Schultz or Kenyon Sadiq13.6 · 13.5
- Sam LaPorta or Travis Kelce14.9 · 15.1
- Harold Fannin Jr. or Tucker Kraft13.2 · 13.0
- AJ Barner or Hunter Henry11.0 · 11.2
- More TE start/sit calls (tight ends this week)