Cole
Kmet
Tight End · Chicago Bears
TIER 11
Compare players
The full breakdown
vs
Scoring
Format
Compare players
The full breakdown
Cole
Mike
Gesicki
Tight End · Cincinnati Bengals
TIER 11
THE READ · PPR
DRAFT
Cole Kmet
YAC/Reception advantage
Cole comes out ahead on YAC/Reception: 5.0 vs 2.2.
Snap Share advantage
Cole comes out ahead on Snap Share: 71% vs 42%.
Route Participation advantage
Cole comes out ahead on Route Participation: 67% vs 49%.
The Exception
When to take Michael instead
Michael comes out ahead on Drop Rate and YPRR.
- TE 45
Expert ECR
TE 34 - 5.6
Projected PPG
5.6
- 79.2
Fantasy Points
71.7 - 48
Targets
42 - 30
Receptions
28 - 347
Rec Yards
307 - 2
Rec TDs
2
- 67%
Route Participation
49% - 10%
Target Share
10% - 48
Targets
42 - 9
Red-Zone Targets
8 - 71%
Snap Share
42%
- 0.74
YPRR
1.22 - 0.10
TPRR
0.17 - 67%
Catch Rate
69% - 5.0
YAC/Reception
2.2 - 4%
Drop Rate
2%
- 32 of 34
Availability · last 2 seasons
28 of 34 - —
Chronic injury risk
—
- Run-leaning · 59% passNegative
COACHING SCHEME
Pass-leaning · 66% passPositive - 161 vacated targetsPositive
INTERNAL COMPETITION
41 vacated targetsPositive - 161 targets vacatedPositive
VACATED TARGETS
41 targets vacatedPositive
