Taylor
RB · IND vs WAS
Proj pts
28.4pts
market
McCaffrey
RB · SF vs DEN
Proj pts
28.2pts
market
Christian McCaffrey or Jonathan Taylor: who should I start in Week 4?
Start Jonathan Taylor. Bench Christian McCaffrey. Jonathan Taylor leads at 28.4. Christian McCaffrey is the first one out, 0.2 short.
Crowd: started Taylor 99% · McCaffrey 99%
Highlights
Pros
- Bell-cow role46% of touches
- Goal-line back1.4 GL carries/g
- Run-funnel matchupRun-funnel vs RB
Pros
- Bell-cow role47% of touches
- Goal-line back1.2 GL carries/g
- Pass-game role7.6 targets/g
Cons
- Tough matchupTough · F vs RB
Some recent form, opportunity and matchup figures still lean on the 2025 season (not enough games played this season yet).
Week 4 · Updated Tue 6:00 AM ET
Why Jonathan Taylor
Start Jonathan Taylor — projects 28.4, a run-funnel matchup vs WAS, with a rising role.
Jonathan Taylor projects 28.4 points on a 10.7–35.8 range. The matchup grades as run-funnel against WAS. Usage: carries / game at 19.0. Net: Jonathan Taylor is start this week.
Working for Taylor: Bell-cow role (46% of touches), Goal-line back (1.4 GL carries/g), Run-funnel matchup (Run-funnel vs RB).
Where Taylor leads the head-to-head: Projection (28.4 vs 28.2); Ceiling (35.8 vs 31.0); Matchup grade (recency weighted) (A- vs F); Implied team total (25.5 vs 25.3); Last 3 avg (21.2 vs 19.3); vs season (+2.0 vs -3.0); Boom rate (29% vs 6%); Carries / game (19.0 vs 18.3); Yards per carry (4.9 vs 3.9); Goal line carries (24 vs 21); Grade vs RB (recency weighted) (A- vs F); Implied total (25.5 vs 25.3).
Why Christian McCaffrey
Sit Christian McCaffrey — projects 28.2, a tough matchup vs DEN, but the role is cooling.
Christian McCaffrey projects 28.2 points on a 17.2–31.0 range. The matchup grades as tough against DEN. Usage: carries / game at 18.3. Net: Christian McCaffrey is a bench this week.
Working for McCaffrey: Bell-cow role (47% of touches), Goal-line back (1.2 GL carries/g), Pass-game role (7.6 targets/g).
Working against McCaffrey: Tough matchup (Tough · F vs RB).
Where McCaffrey leads the head-to-head: Floor (17.2 vs 10.7); Touch share (47% vs 46%); Opportunity score (22.6 vs 16.7); Last 5 avg (19.8 vs 17.4); Consistency (68% vs 43%); Bust rate (6% vs 18%); Touches / game (24.3 vs 21.7); Target share (23% vs 11%); Opportunity score (exp pts) (22.6 vs 16.7); Red zone carries (80 vs 71).
Recent form
Jonathan Taylor's last 5 games: PPR points 17.4, 5.9, 25.1, 29.2, 9.2 (oldest to newest).
Christian McCaffrey's last 5 games: PPR points 28.1, 12.7, 13.8, 22.6, 21.6 (oldest to newest).
Taylor has already beaten McCaffrey's 28.2 projection in 1 of his 5; McCaffrey has beaten Taylor's 28.4 in 0 of his 5.
At least 1 of these 5 were played before the 2026 season — the card does not date them.
Matchup
Jonathan Taylor (IND) faces WAS, kickoff Sun 9:30 AM ET. The matchup is rated run-funnel. Betting line: implied team total 25.5, spread -3.5.
Christian McCaffrey (SF) faces DEN, kickoff Sun 4:25 PM ET. The matchup is rated tough. Betting line: implied team total 25.3, spread -3.0.
What flips it
Taylor's edge is 0.2 points (28.4 to 28.2). McCaffrey's ceiling (31) clears Taylor's projection, so a big game from McCaffrey flips it. Taylor's floor (10.7) sits under McCaffrey's projection, so a quiet game from Taylor flips it too. Confidence in the call: lower.
How to read these numbers
- Confidence in the call
- How clear-cut this start/sit call is — how decisively the player beats the alternative he competes with (for a starter, the best player on your bench; for a bench player, the last one in your lineup), on both projected points and the overlap of their likely ranges. A clear play reads high; a genuine toss-up reads lower. It rates the decision, not the player’s own volatility, and is not a measured accuracy rate.
- Floor
- The 20th percentile of the same simulated distribution.
- Ceiling
- The 90th percentile of the same simulated distribution.
- Opportunity score
- Expected points from projected volume alone, before any efficiency of this player’s own: each projected touch and target valued at the positional average for the scoring format.
- Matchup grade
- The opponent’s points allowed to this position per game, weighted toward recent games, then graded on a curve across the 32 defenses.
- Implied team total
- The points the betting market expects this team to score, derived from the game total and the spread. Market-derived, not modelled by Nuvela.
- Trend
- The direction of his scoring across the trailing window, classified as heating, steady or cooling.
- Touch share trend
- The same classification, measured on his share of team touches rather than on his points.
- Consistency
- The share of his games that landed within a set band of his own per-game average.
- Boom rate
- The share of his games that finished inside the top 12 scorers at his position for that week.
- Bust rate
- The share of his games that came in under half of what he was projected for that week.
- Vacated touches
- Carries and targets belonging to team-mates who are ruled out, on IR, or listed as non-participants for this week, taken at their recent per-game rate.
- Defense funnel
- Whether the opponent’s rush defense and pass defense are far enough apart to push offenses one way. A gap inside the band reads Neutral.
- Game script projection
- The expected state of the game for his team — favoured, level or trailing — taken from the closing spread.
More start/sit comparisons from this week's PPR projections. Open a pair for the call and the reasoning.