Taylor
RB · IND vs WAS
Proj pts
28.4pts
market
Brown
RB · CIN vs JAX
Proj pts
23.6pts
market
Chase Brown or Jonathan Taylor: who should I start in Week 4?
Start Jonathan Taylor. Bench Chase Brown. Jonathan Taylor leads at 28.4. Chase Brown is the first one out, 4.8 short.
Crowd: started Taylor 99% · Brown 95%
Highlights
Pros
- Clear start4.8 pts clear
- Bell-cow role46% of touches
- Goal-line back1.4 GL carries/g
Pros
- High-scoring spot27.0 team total
- Pass-game role5.2 targets/g
- High floor16.4 floor
Cons
- Below your start line4.8 pts short
- Tough matchupTough · D- vs RB
Some recent form, opportunity and matchup figures still lean on the 2025 season (not enough games played this season yet).
Week 4 · Updated Tue 6:00 AM ET
Why Jonathan Taylor
Start Jonathan Taylor — projects 28.4, a run-funnel matchup vs WAS, with a rising role.
Jonathan Taylor projects 28.4 points on a 10.7–35.8 range. The matchup grades as run-funnel against WAS. Usage: carries / game at 19.0. Net: Jonathan Taylor is start this week.
Working for Taylor: Clear start (4.8 pts clear), Bell-cow role (46% of touches), Goal-line back (1.4 GL carries/g).
Where Taylor leads the head-to-head: Projection (28.4 vs 23.6); Ceiling (35.8 vs 25.6); Touch share (46% vs 38%); Opportunity score (16.7 vs 16.1); Matchup grade (recency weighted) (A- vs D-); Last 3 avg (21.2 vs 13.0); vs season (+2.0 vs -1.5); Boom rate (29% vs 18%); Carries / game (19.0 vs 13.6); Touches / game (21.7 vs 17.7); Opportunity score (exp pts) (16.7 vs 16.1); Yards per carry (4.9 vs 4.4); Goal line carries (24 vs 13); Red zone carries (71 vs 37); Grade vs RB (recency weighted) (A- vs D-).
Why Chase Brown
Sit Chase Brown — projects 23.6, a tough matchup vs JAX, but the role is cooling.
Chase Brown projects 23.6 points on a 16.4–25.6 range. The matchup grades as tough against JAX. Usage: carries / game at 13.6. Net: Chase Brown is a bench this week.
Working for Brown: High-scoring spot (27.0 team total), Pass-game role (5.2 targets/g), High floor (16.4 floor).
Working against Brown: Below your start line (4.8 pts short), Tough matchup (Tough · D- vs RB).
Where Brown leads the head-to-head: Floor (16.4 vs 10.7); Implied team total (27.0 vs 25.5); Consistency (59% vs 43%); Bust rate (6% vs 18%); Target share (14% vs 11%); Implied total (27.0 vs 25.5).
Recent form
Jonathan Taylor's last 5 games: PPR points 17.4, 5.9, 25.1, 29.2, 9.2 (oldest to newest).
Chase Brown's last 5 games: PPR points 29.1, 19, 18.8, 11.2, 8.9 (oldest to newest).
Taylor has already beaten Brown's 23.6 projection in 2 of his 5; Brown has beaten Taylor's 28.4 in 1 of his 5.
At least 1 of these 5 were played before the 2026 season — the card does not date them.
Matchup
Jonathan Taylor (IND) faces WAS, kickoff Sun 9:30 AM ET. The matchup is rated run-funnel. Betting line: implied team total 25.5, spread -3.5.
Chase Brown (CIN) faces JAX, kickoff Sun 1:00 PM ET. The matchup is rated tough. Betting line: implied team total 27.0, spread -2.5.
What flips it
Taylor's edge is 4.8 points (28.4 to 23.6). Taylor's floor (10.7) sits under Brown's projection, so a quiet game from Taylor flips it. Confidence in the call: high.
How to read these numbers
- Confidence in the call
- How clear-cut this start/sit call is — how decisively the player beats the alternative he competes with (for a starter, the best player on your bench; for a bench player, the last one in your lineup), on both projected points and the overlap of their likely ranges. A clear play reads high; a genuine toss-up reads lower. It rates the decision, not the player’s own volatility, and is not a measured accuracy rate.
- Floor
- The 20th percentile of the same simulated distribution.
- Ceiling
- The 90th percentile of the same simulated distribution.
- Opportunity score
- Expected points from projected volume alone, before any efficiency of this player’s own: each projected touch and target valued at the positional average for the scoring format.
- Matchup grade
- The opponent’s points allowed to this position per game, weighted toward recent games, then graded on a curve across the 32 defenses.
- Implied team total
- The points the betting market expects this team to score, derived from the game total and the spread. Market-derived, not modelled by Nuvela.
- Trend
- The direction of his scoring across the trailing window, classified as heating, steady or cooling.
- Touch share trend
- The same classification, measured on his share of team touches rather than on his points.
- Consistency
- The share of his games that landed within a set band of his own per-game average.
- Boom rate
- The share of his games that finished inside the top 12 scorers at his position for that week.
- Bust rate
- The share of his games that came in under half of what he was projected for that week.
- Vacated touches
- Carries and targets belonging to team-mates who are ruled out, on IR, or listed as non-participants for this week, taken at their recent per-game rate.
- Defense funnel
- Whether the opponent’s rush defense and pass defense are far enough apart to push offenses one way. A gap inside the band reads Neutral.
- Game script projection
- The expected state of the game for his team — favoured, level or trailing — taken from the closing spread.
More start/sit comparisons from this week's PPR projections. Open a pair for the call and the reasoning.