Sutton
WR · DEN vs SF
Proj pts
11.9pts
market
Washington
WR · MIA vs MIN
Proj pts
11.4pts
market
Courtland Sutton or Malik Washington: who should I start in Week 4?
Start Courtland Sutton. Bench Malik Washington. Courtland Sutton leads at 11.9. Malik Washington is the first one out, 0.6 short.
Crowd: started Washington 37%
Highlights
Pros
- Every-down role85% of snaps
Cons
- Low target share14% target share
- Thin volume3.8 targets/g
Some recent form, opportunity and matchup figures still lean on the 2025 season (not enough games played this season yet).
Week 4 · Updated Tue 6:00 AM ET
Why Courtland Sutton
Start Courtland Sutton — projects 11.9, an even matchup vs SF, but the role is cooling.
Courtland Sutton projects 11.9 points on a 7.0–19.4 range. The matchup grades as neutral against SF. Usage: targets / game at 7.3. Net: Courtland Sutton is start this week.
Working for Sutton: Every-down role (85% of snaps).
Where Sutton leads the head-to-head: Projection (11.9 vs 11.4); Floor (7.0 vs 5.6); Ceiling (19.4 vs 15.1); Target share (21% vs 14%); Matchup grade (recency weighted) (B- vs F); Implied team total (22.3 vs 14.0); Targets / game (7.3 vs 3.8); Snap share (85% vs 57%); Red zone targets (21 vs 11); Grade vs WR (recency weighted) (B- vs F); Implied total (22.3 vs 14.0).
Why Malik Washington
Sit Malik Washington — projects 11.4, a tough matchup vs MIN, with a rising role.
Malik Washington projects 11.4 points on a 5.6–15.1 range. The matchup grades as tough against MIN. Usage: targets / game at 3.8. Net: Malik Washington is a bench this week.
Working against Washington: Low target share (14% target share), Thin volume (3.8 targets/g).
Where Washington leads the head-to-head: Last 3 avg (8.7 vs 5.4); Last 5 avg (7.9 vs 5.1); vs season (+0.9 vs -5.9); Consistency (50% vs 45%); Boom rate (24% vs 18%); Bust rate (12% vs 24%).
Recent form
Courtland Sutton's last 5 games: PPR points 8, 1.5, 3.1, 5.5, 7.6 (oldest to newest).
Malik Washington's last 5 games: PPR points 1.5, 11.8, 6.3, 8.7, 11.1 (oldest to newest).
Sutton has already beaten Washington's 11.4 projection in 0 of his 5; Washington has beaten Sutton's 11.9 in 0 of his 5.
At least 1 of these 5 were played before the 2026 season — the card does not date them.
Matchup
Courtland Sutton (DEN) faces SF, kickoff Sun 4:25 PM ET. The matchup is rated neutral. Betting line: implied team total 22.3, spread +3.0.
Malik Washington (MIA) faces MIN, kickoff Sun 4:05 PM ET. The matchup is rated tough. Betting line: implied team total 14.0, spread +10.5.
What flips it
Sutton's edge is 0.5 points (11.9 to 11.4). Washington's ceiling (15.1) clears Sutton's projection, so a big game from Washington flips it. Sutton's floor (7) sits under Washington's projection, so a quiet game from Sutton flips it too. Confidence in the call: moderate.
How to read these numbers
- Confidence in the call
- How clear-cut this start/sit call is — how decisively the player beats the alternative he competes with (for a starter, the best player on your bench; for a bench player, the last one in your lineup), on both projected points and the overlap of their likely ranges. A clear play reads high; a genuine toss-up reads lower. It rates the decision, not the player’s own volatility, and is not a measured accuracy rate.
- Floor
- The 20th percentile of the same simulated distribution.
- Ceiling
- The 90th percentile of the same simulated distribution.
- Matchup grade
- The opponent’s points allowed to this position per game, weighted toward recent games, then graded on a curve across the 32 defenses.
- Implied team total
- The points the betting market expects this team to score, derived from the game total and the spread. Market-derived, not modelled by Nuvela.
- Trend
- The direction of his scoring across the trailing window, classified as heating, steady or cooling.
- Consistency
- The share of his games that landed within a set band of his own per-game average.
- Boom rate
- The share of his games that finished inside the top 12 scorers at his position for that week.
- Bust rate
- The share of his games that came in under half of what he was projected for that week.
- Defense funnel
- Whether the opponent’s rush defense and pass defense are far enough apart to push offenses one way. A gap inside the band reads Neutral.
- Game script projection
- The expected state of the game for his team — favoured, level or trailing — taken from the closing spread.
More start/sit comparisons from this week's PPR projections. Open a pair for the call and the reasoning.