Maye
QB · NE vs BUF
Proj pts
17.9pts
market
Mariota
QB · WAS vs IND
Proj pts
17.3pts
market
Drake Maye or Marcus Mariota: who should I start in Week 4?
Start Drake Maye. Bench Marcus Mariota. Drake Maye leads at 17.9. Marcus Mariota is the first one out, 0.6 short.
Crowd: started Maye 34% · Mariota 44%
Highlights
Pros
- Rushing floor6.1 rush att/g
- Reliable73% consistency
Cons
- Tough matchupTough · D- vs QB
- Cooling off7.2 last 3
Pros
- Rushing floor5.0 rush att/g
Cons
- Shaky floor9.8 floor
Some recent form, opportunity and matchup figures still lean on the 2025 season (not enough games played this season yet).
Week 4 · Updated Tue 6:00 AM ET
Why Drake Maye
Start Drake Maye — projects 17.9, a tough matchup vs BUF, but the role is cooling.
Drake Maye projects 17.9 points on a 13.8–23.9 range. The matchup grades as tough against BUF. Usage: pass attempts / game at 28.9. Net: Drake Maye is start this week.
Working for Maye: Rushing floor (6.1 rush att/g), Reliable (73% consistency).
Working against Maye: Tough matchup (Tough · D- vs QB), Cooling off (7.2 last 3).
Where Maye leads the head-to-head: Projection (17.9 vs 17.3); Floor (13.8 vs 9.8); Ceiling (23.9 vs 20.1); Pass attempts (28.9 vs 22.7); Last 5 avg (14.0 vs 11.9); Consistency (73% vs 38%); Bust rate (0% vs 30%); Pass attempts / game (28.9 vs 22.7); Completions / game (20.8 vs 13.9); Yards per attempt (8.9 vs 7.5); Touchdown rate (6% vs 4%); Rush attempts / game (6.1 vs 5.0).
Why Marcus Mariota
Sit Marcus Mariota — projects 17.3, an even matchup vs IND, but the role is cooling.
Marcus Mariota projects 17.3 points on a 9.8–20.1 range. The matchup grades as neutral against IND. Usage: pass attempts / game at 22.7. Net: Marcus Mariota is a bench this week.
Working for Mariota: Rushing floor (5.0 rush att/g).
Working against Mariota: Shaky floor (9.8 floor).
Where Mariota leads the head-to-head: Matchup grade (recency weighted) (C+ vs D-); Implied team total (22.0 vs 20.8); Last 3 avg (14.6 vs 7.2); vs season (-0.8 vs -2.8); Boom rate (20% vs 6%); Rush yards / game (29.7 vs 26.5); Rushing production share (28% vs 19%); Grade vs QB (recency weighted) (C+ vs D-); Implied total (22.0 vs 20.8).
Recent form
Drake Maye's last 5 games: PPR points 32.4, 15.7, 9.8, 8, 3.8 (oldest to newest).
Marcus Mariota's last 4 games: PPR points 3.7, 8.7, 14.7, 20.4 (low to high; the card does not say which came first).
Maye has already beaten Mariota's 17.3 projection in 1 of his 5; Mariota has beaten Maye's 17.9 in 1 of his 4.
At least 1 of these 5 were played before the 2026 season — the card does not date them.
Matchup
Drake Maye (NE) faces BUF, kickoff Sun 1:00 PM ET. The matchup is rated tough. Betting line: implied team total 20.8, spread +7.0.
Marcus Mariota (WAS) faces IND, kickoff Sun 9:30 AM ET. The matchup is rated neutral. Betting line: implied team total 22.0, spread +3.5.
What flips it
Maye's edge is 0.6 points (17.9 to 17.3). Mariota's ceiling (20.1) clears Maye's projection, so a big game from Mariota flips it. Maye's floor (13.8) sits under Mariota's projection, so a quiet game from Maye flips it too. Confidence in the call: moderate.
How to read these numbers
- Confidence in the call
- How clear-cut this start/sit call is — how decisively the player beats the alternative he competes with (for a starter, the best player on your bench; for a bench player, the last one in your lineup), on both projected points and the overlap of their likely ranges. A clear play reads high; a genuine toss-up reads lower. It rates the decision, not the player’s own volatility, and is not a measured accuracy rate.
- Floor
- The 20th percentile of the same simulated distribution.
- Ceiling
- The 90th percentile of the same simulated distribution.
- Matchup grade
- The opponent’s points allowed to this position per game, weighted toward recent games, then graded on a curve across the 32 defenses.
- Implied team total
- The points the betting market expects this team to score, derived from the game total and the spread. Market-derived, not modelled by Nuvela.
- Trend
- The direction of his scoring across the trailing window, classified as heating, steady or cooling.
- Consistency
- The share of his games that landed within a set band of his own per-game average.
- Boom rate
- The share of his games that finished inside the top 12 scorers at his position for that week.
- Bust rate
- The share of his games that came in under half of what he was projected for that week.
- Defense funnel
- Whether the opponent’s rush defense and pass defense are far enough apart to push offenses one way. A gap inside the band reads Neutral.
- Game script projection
- The expected state of the game for his team — favoured, level or trailing — taken from the closing spread.
More start/sit comparisons from this week's PPR projections. Open a pair for the call and the reasoning.