Stevenson
RB · NE vs BUF
Proj pts
15.1pts
market
Croskey-Merritt
RB · WAS vs IND
Proj pts
13.5pts
market
Jacory Croskey-Merritt or Rhamondre Stevenson: who should I start in Week 4?
Start Rhamondre Stevenson. Bench Jacory Croskey-Merritt. Rhamondre Stevenson leads at 15.1. Jacory Croskey-Merritt is the first one out, 1.6 short.
Crowd: started Stevenson 42% · Croskey-Merritt 31%
Highlights
Pros
- Run-funnel matchupRun-funnel vs RB
- Spike upside23.9 ceiling
Cons
- Committee back19% of touches
- Negative game scriptTrailing
Cons
- Below your start line1.6 pts short
- Committee back24% of touches
Some recent form, opportunity and matchup figures still lean on the 2025 season (not enough games played this season yet).
Week 4 · Updated Tue 6:00 AM ET
Why Rhamondre Stevenson
Start Rhamondre Stevenson — projects 15.1, a run-funnel matchup vs BUF, but the role is cooling.
Rhamondre Stevenson projects 15.1 points on a 6.5–23.9 range. The matchup grades as run-funnel against BUF. Usage: carries / game at 9.3. Net: Rhamondre Stevenson is start this week.
Working for Stevenson: Run-funnel matchup (Run-funnel vs RB), Spike upside (23.9 ceiling).
Working against Stevenson: Committee back (19% of touches), Negative game script (Trailing).
Where Stevenson leads the head-to-head: Projection (15.1 vs 13.5); Floor (6.5 vs 5.1); Ceiling (23.9 vs 16.3); Opportunity score (9.7 vs 7.7); Matchup grade (recency weighted) (B+ vs C-); Last 3 avg (8.3 vs 7.9); Last 5 avg (17.5 vs 9.8); vs season (+4.0 vs +1.5); Consistency (24% vs 20%); Touches / game (11.6 vs 10.8); Target share (10% vs 3%); Opportunity score (exp pts) (9.7 vs 7.7); Snap share (59% vs 40%); Grade vs RB (recency weighted) (B+ vs C-).
Why Jacory Croskey-Merritt
Sit Jacory Croskey-Merritt — projects 13.5, an even matchup vs IND.
Jacory Croskey-Merritt projects 13.5 points on a 5.1–16.3 range. The matchup grades as neutral against IND. Usage: carries / game at 10.3. Net: Jacory Croskey-Merritt is a bench this week.
Working against Croskey-Merritt: Below your start line (1.6 pts short), Committee back (24% of touches).
Where Croskey-Merritt leads the head-to-head: Touch share (24% vs 19%); Implied team total (22.0 vs 20.8); Boom rate (23% vs 21%); Bust rate (38% vs 43%); Carries / game (10.3 vs 9.3); Red zone carries (32 vs 31); Implied total (22.0 vs 20.8).
Recent form
Rhamondre Stevenson's last 5 games: PPR points 27.2, 35.3, 14.5, 3.6, 6.8 (oldest to newest).
Jacory Croskey-Merritt's last 5 games: PPR points 22.5, 2.9, 12.6, 5.8, 5.3 (oldest to newest).
Stevenson has already beaten Croskey-Merritt's 13.5 projection in 3 of his 5; Croskey-Merritt has beaten Stevenson's 15.1 in 1 of his 5.
At least 1 of these 5 were played before the 2026 season — the card does not date them.
Matchup
Rhamondre Stevenson (NE) faces BUF, kickoff Sun 1:00 PM ET. The matchup is rated run-funnel. Betting line: implied team total 20.8, spread +7.0.
Jacory Croskey-Merritt (WAS) faces IND, kickoff Sun 9:30 AM ET. The matchup is rated neutral. Betting line: implied team total 22.0, spread +3.5.
What flips it
Stevenson's edge is 1.6 points (15.1 to 13.5). Croskey-Merritt's ceiling (16.3) clears Stevenson's projection, so a big game from Croskey-Merritt flips it. Stevenson's floor (6.5) sits under Croskey-Merritt's projection, so a quiet game from Stevenson flips it too. Confidence in the call: moderate.
How to read these numbers
- Confidence in the call
- How clear-cut this start/sit call is — how decisively the player beats the alternative he competes with (for a starter, the best player on your bench; for a bench player, the last one in your lineup), on both projected points and the overlap of their likely ranges. A clear play reads high; a genuine toss-up reads lower. It rates the decision, not the player’s own volatility, and is not a measured accuracy rate.
- Floor
- The 20th percentile of the same simulated distribution.
- Ceiling
- The 90th percentile of the same simulated distribution.
- Opportunity score
- Expected points from projected volume alone, before any efficiency of this player’s own: each projected touch and target valued at the positional average for the scoring format.
- Matchup grade
- The opponent’s points allowed to this position per game, weighted toward recent games, then graded on a curve across the 32 defenses.
- Implied team total
- The points the betting market expects this team to score, derived from the game total and the spread. Market-derived, not modelled by Nuvela.
- Trend
- The direction of his scoring across the trailing window, classified as heating, steady or cooling.
- Touch share trend
- The same classification, measured on his share of team touches rather than on his points.
- Consistency
- The share of his games that landed within a set band of his own per-game average.
- Boom rate
- The share of his games that finished inside the top 12 scorers at his position for that week.
- Bust rate
- The share of his games that came in under half of what he was projected for that week.
- Vacated touches
- Carries and targets belonging to team-mates who are ruled out, on IR, or listed as non-participants for this week, taken at their recent per-game rate.
- Defense funnel
- Whether the opponent’s rush defense and pass defense are far enough apart to push offenses one way. A gap inside the band reads Neutral.
- Game script projection
- The expected state of the game for his team — favoured, level or trailing — taken from the closing spread.
More start/sit comparisons from this week's PPR projections. Open a pair for the call and the reasoning.