Stevenson
RB · NE vs BUF
Proj pts
15.1pts
market
Williams
RB · LA vs PHI
Proj pts
14.4pts
market
Kyren Williams or Rhamondre Stevenson: who should I start in Week 4?
Start Rhamondre Stevenson. Bench Kyren Williams. Rhamondre Stevenson leads at 15.1. Kyren Williams is the first one out, 0.7 short.
Crowd: started Stevenson 42% · Williams 97%
Highlights
Pros
- Run-funnel matchupRun-funnel vs RB
- Spike upside23.9 ceiling
Cons
- Committee back19% of touches
- Negative game scriptTrailing
Pros
- Goal-line back1.2 GL carries/g
- Positive game scriptFavored
- High floor12.7 floor
Some recent form, opportunity and matchup figures still lean on the 2025 season (not enough games played this season yet).
Week 4 · Updated Tue 6:00 AM ET
Why Rhamondre Stevenson
Start Rhamondre Stevenson — projects 15.1, a run-funnel matchup vs BUF, but the role is cooling.
Rhamondre Stevenson projects 15.1 points on a 6.5–23.9 range. The matchup grades as run-funnel against BUF. Usage: carries / game at 9.3. Net: Rhamondre Stevenson is start this week.
Working for Stevenson: Run-funnel matchup (Run-funnel vs RB), Spike upside (23.9 ceiling).
Working against Stevenson: Committee back (19% of touches), Negative game script (Trailing).
Where Stevenson leads the head-to-head: Projection (15.1 vs 14.4); Ceiling (23.9 vs 20.4); Matchup grade (recency weighted) (B+ vs B-); Last 5 avg (17.5 vs 16.0); vs season (+4.0 vs +1.0); Boom rate (21% vs 6%); Target share (10% vs 8%); Grade vs RB (recency weighted) (B+ vs B-).
Why Kyren Williams
Sit Kyren Williams — projects 14.4, an even matchup vs PHI, with a rising role.
Kyren Williams projects 14.4 points on a 12.7–20.4 range. The matchup grades as neutral against PHI. Usage: carries / game at 15.2. Net: Kyren Williams is a bench this week.
Working for Williams: Goal-line back (1.2 GL carries/g), Positive game script (Favored), High floor (12.7 floor).
Where Williams leads the head-to-head: Floor (12.7 vs 6.5); Touch share (35% vs 19%); Opportunity score (13.9 vs 9.7); Implied team total (23.3 vs 20.8); Last 3 avg (17.7 vs 8.3); Consistency (62% vs 24%); Bust rate (6% vs 43%); Carries / game (15.2 vs 9.3); Touches / game (17.4 vs 11.6); Opportunity score (exp pts) (13.9 vs 9.7); Yards per carry (4.8 vs 4.6); Snap share (68% vs 59%); Goal line carries (20 vs 13); Red zone carries (61 vs 31); Implied total (23.3 vs 20.8).
Recent form
Rhamondre Stevenson's last 5 games: PPR points 27.2, 35.3, 14.5, 3.6, 6.8 (oldest to newest).
Kyren Williams's last 5 games: PPR points 16, 11.1, 15.5, 15.7, 21.8 (oldest to newest).
Stevenson has already beaten Williams's 14.4 projection in 3 of his 5; Williams has beaten Stevenson's 15.1 in 4 of his 5.
At least 1 of these 5 were played before the 2026 season — the card does not date them.
Matchup
Rhamondre Stevenson (NE) faces BUF, kickoff Sun 1:00 PM ET. The matchup is rated run-funnel. Betting line: implied team total 20.8, spread +7.0.
Kyren Williams (LA) faces PHI, kickoff Sun 1:00 PM ET. The matchup is rated neutral. Betting line: implied team total 23.3, spread -3.0.
What flips it
Stevenson's edge is 0.7 points (15.1 to 14.4). Williams's ceiling (20.4) clears Stevenson's projection, so a big game from Williams flips it. Stevenson's floor (6.5) sits under Williams's projection, so a quiet game from Stevenson flips it too. Confidence in the call: moderate.
How to read these numbers
- Confidence in the call
- How clear-cut this start/sit call is — how decisively the player beats the alternative he competes with (for a starter, the best player on your bench; for a bench player, the last one in your lineup), on both projected points and the overlap of their likely ranges. A clear play reads high; a genuine toss-up reads lower. It rates the decision, not the player’s own volatility, and is not a measured accuracy rate.
- Floor
- The 20th percentile of the same simulated distribution.
- Ceiling
- The 90th percentile of the same simulated distribution.
- Opportunity score
- Expected points from projected volume alone, before any efficiency of this player’s own: each projected touch and target valued at the positional average for the scoring format.
- Matchup grade
- The opponent’s points allowed to this position per game, weighted toward recent games, then graded on a curve across the 32 defenses.
- Implied team total
- The points the betting market expects this team to score, derived from the game total and the spread. Market-derived, not modelled by Nuvela.
- Trend
- The direction of his scoring across the trailing window, classified as heating, steady or cooling.
- Touch share trend
- The same classification, measured on his share of team touches rather than on his points.
- Consistency
- The share of his games that landed within a set band of his own per-game average.
- Boom rate
- The share of his games that finished inside the top 12 scorers at his position for that week.
- Bust rate
- The share of his games that came in under half of what he was projected for that week.
- Vacated touches
- Carries and targets belonging to team-mates who are ruled out, on IR, or listed as non-participants for this week, taken at their recent per-game rate.
- Defense funnel
- Whether the opponent’s rush defense and pass defense are far enough apart to push offenses one way. A gap inside the band reads Neutral.
- Game script projection
- The expected state of the game for his team — favoured, level or trailing — taken from the closing spread.
More start/sit comparisons from this week's PPR projections. Open a pair for the call and the reasoning.