Hampton
RB · LAC vs SEA
Proj pts
12.1pts
market
Monangai
RB · CHI vs NYJ
Proj pts
9.9pts
market
Kyle Monangai or Omarion Hampton: who should I start in Week 4?
Start Omarion Hampton. Bench Kyle Monangai. Omarion Hampton leads at 12.1. Kyle Monangai is the first one out, 2.2 short.
Crowd: started Hampton 74%
Highlights
Pros
- High floor11.9 floor
Cons
- Committee back19% of touches
- Low team total17.8 team total
Pros
- Run-funnel matchupRun-funnel vs RB
- Positive game scriptFavored
Cons
- Below your start line2.2 pts short
- Committee back22% of touches
Some recent form, opportunity and matchup figures still lean on the 2025 season (not enough games played this season yet).
Week 4 · Updated Tue 6:00 AM ET
Why Omarion Hampton
Start Omarion Hampton — projects 12.1, a tough matchup vs SEA, but the role is cooling.
Omarion Hampton projects 12.1 points on a 11.9–23.2 range. The matchup grades as tough against SEA. Usage: carries / game at 13.8. Net: Omarion Hampton is start this week.
Working for Hampton: High floor (11.9 floor).
Working against Hampton: Committee back (19% of touches), Low team total (17.8 team total).
Where Hampton leads the head-to-head: Projection (12.1 vs 9.9); Floor (11.9 vs 7.2); Ceiling (23.2 vs 17.4); Opportunity score (14.4 vs 8.9); Last 3 avg (10.5 vs 10.4); Last 5 avg (13.6 vs 9.0); Consistency (52% vs 35%); Bust rate (11% vs 25%); Carries / game (13.8 vs 9.9); Touches / game (17.3 vs 11.0); Target share (12% vs 6%); Opportunity score (exp pts) (14.4 vs 8.9); Snap share (63% vs 41%).
Why Kyle Monangai
Sit Kyle Monangai — projects 9.9, a run-funnel matchup vs NYJ.
Kyle Monangai projects 9.9 points on a 7.2–17.4 range. The matchup grades as run-funnel against NYJ. Usage: carries / game at 9.9. Net: Kyle Monangai is a bench this week.
Working for Monangai: Run-funnel matchup (Run-funnel vs RB), Positive game script (Favored).
Working against Monangai: Below your start line (2.2 pts short), Committee back (22% of touches).
Where Monangai leads the head-to-head: Touch share (22% vs 19%); Matchup grade (recency weighted) (A+ vs D); Implied team total (23.5 vs 17.8); vs season (-1.1 vs -2.2); Boom rate (25% vs 22%); Yards per carry (4.6 vs 4.4); Goal line carries (13 vs 8); Red zone carries (42 vs 26); Grade vs RB (recency weighted) (A+ vs D); Implied total (23.5 vs 17.8).
Recent form
Omarion Hampton's last 5 games: PPR points 16.5, 20, 8.3, 17.5, 5.6 (oldest to newest).
Kyle Monangai's last 5 games: PPR points 7.7, 5.9, 20.4, 7.8, 3.1 (oldest to newest).
Hampton has already beaten Monangai's 9.9 projection in 3 of his 5; Monangai has beaten Hampton's 12.1 in 1 of his 5.
At least 1 of these 5 were played before the 2026 season — the card does not date them.
Matchup
Omarion Hampton (LAC) faces SEA, kickoff Sun 4:25 PM ET. The matchup is rated tough. Betting line: implied team total 17.8, spread +7.0.
Kyle Monangai (CHI) faces NYJ, kickoff Sun 1:00 PM ET. The matchup is rated run-funnel. Betting line: implied team total 23.5, spread -3.5.
What flips it
Hampton's edge is 2.2 points (12.1 to 9.9). Monangai's ceiling (17.4) clears Hampton's projection, so a big game from Monangai flips it. Confidence in the call: moderate.
How to read these numbers
- Confidence in the call
- How clear-cut this start/sit call is — how decisively the player beats the alternative he competes with (for a starter, the best player on your bench; for a bench player, the last one in your lineup), on both projected points and the overlap of their likely ranges. A clear play reads high; a genuine toss-up reads lower. It rates the decision, not the player’s own volatility, and is not a measured accuracy rate.
- Floor
- The 20th percentile of the same simulated distribution.
- Ceiling
- The 90th percentile of the same simulated distribution.
- Opportunity score
- Expected points from projected volume alone, before any efficiency of this player’s own: each projected touch and target valued at the positional average for the scoring format.
- Matchup grade
- The opponent’s points allowed to this position per game, weighted toward recent games, then graded on a curve across the 32 defenses.
- Implied team total
- The points the betting market expects this team to score, derived from the game total and the spread. Market-derived, not modelled by Nuvela.
- Trend
- The direction of his scoring across the trailing window, classified as heating, steady or cooling.
- Touch share trend
- The same classification, measured on his share of team touches rather than on his points.
- Consistency
- The share of his games that landed within a set band of his own per-game average.
- Boom rate
- The share of his games that finished inside the top 12 scorers at his position for that week.
- Bust rate
- The share of his games that came in under half of what he was projected for that week.
- Vacated touches
- Carries and targets belonging to team-mates who are ruled out, on IR, or listed as non-participants for this week, taken at their recent per-game rate.
- Defense funnel
- Whether the opponent’s rush defense and pass defense are far enough apart to push offenses one way. A gap inside the band reads Neutral.
- Game script projection
- The expected state of the game for his team — favoured, level or trailing — taken from the closing spread.
More start/sit comparisons from this week's PPR projections. Open a pair for the call and the reasoning.