Scoring
#1 Start

Gordon

RB · MIA vs MIN

Sun 4:05 PM

Proj pts

7.6pts

market

Mod Conf
Bench

Sanders

RB · CLE vs PIT

Thu 8:15 PM

Proj pts

7pts

market

Mod Conf

Ollie Gordon II or Raheim Sanders: who should I start in Week 4?

Toss-up: lean Ollie Gordon II over Raheim Sanders by 0.6. Ollie Gordon II leads at 7.6. Raheim Sanders is the first one out, 0.6 short.

Crowd: 44% of managers started Gordon.

Availability & news

  • Raheim Sanders

    Sanders caught his sole target for seven yards, had two rushes for four yards and returned two kickoffs for 50 yards in Sunday's 23-19 win over the Buccaneers.(rotowire, Sep 22, 2026)

Highlights

Ollie Gordon IIStart
RB · MIA vs MIN

Pros

  • Big-play upside40% boom weeks

Cons

  • Committee back10% of touches
  • Low team total14.0 team total
Raheim SandersBench
RB · CLE vs PIT

Pros

  • Goal-line back1.0 GL carries/g
  • Reliable86% consistency

Cons

  • Committee back4% of touches
  • Low team total18.0 team total

Some recent form, opportunity and matchup figures still lean on the 2025 season (not enough games played this season yet).

GordonStart
SandersBench
Projection7.67.0
Floor3.64.6
Ceiling12.17.0
Touch share10%4%
Opportunity score3.35.8
Matchup grade(recency weighted)D+D
Implied team total14.018.0

Week 4 · Updated Tue 29 Sep, 6:00 AM ET

The widest gap between them, in proportion, is consistency: Gordon 11%, Sanders 86%.

Sanders: “Sanders caught his sole target for seven yards, had two rushes for four yards and returned two kickoffs for 50 yards in Sunday's 23-19 win over the Buccaneers.” — RotoWire, Sep 22, 2026.

Latest game on the card: Gordon 14.5, Sanders 9.1 (PPR points).

Why Ollie Gordon II

Start Ollie Gordon II — projects 7.6, a tough matchup vs MIN, with a rising role.

Ollie Gordon II projects 7.6 points on a 3.6–12.1 range. The matchup grades as tough against MIN. Usage: carries / game at 4.1. Net: start Ollie Gordon II this week.

Working for Gordon: Big-play upside (40% boom weeks).

Working against Gordon: Committee back (10% of touches), Low team total (14.0 team total).

Where Gordon leads the head-to-head: Projection (7.6 vs 7.0); Ceiling (12.1 vs 7.0); Touch share (10% vs 4%); Matchup grade (recency weighted) (D+ vs D); Last 3 avg (5.8 vs 5.6); vs season (-0.2 vs -0.3); Boom rate (40% vs 0%); Goal line carries (6 vs 4); Red zone carries (19 vs 7).

Why Raheim Sanders

Sit Raheim Sanders — projects 7.0, a tough matchup vs PIT.

Raheim Sanders projects 7.0 points on a 4.6–7.0 range. The matchup grades as tough against PIT. Usage: carries / game at 6.8. Net: bench Raheim Sanders this week.

Working for Sanders: Goal-line back (1.0 GL carries/g), Reliable (86% consistency).

Working against Sanders: Committee back (4% of touches), Low team total (18.0 team total).

Where Sanders leads the head-to-head: Floor (4.6 vs 3.6); Opportunity score (5.8 vs 3.3); Implied team total (18.0 vs 14.0); Last 5 avg (5.0 vs 3.8); Consistency (86% vs 11%); Bust rate (0% vs 50%); Carries / game (6.8 vs 4.1); Touches / game (7.5 vs 4.5); Target share (4% vs 2%); Yards per carry (3.4 vs 2.8); Snap share (26% vs 22%).

Recent form

Ollie Gordon II's last 5 games: PPR points 0.9, 1, 2.1, 0.7, 14.5 (oldest to newest).

Raheim Sanders's last 5 games: PPR points 4.1, 4.3, 5.6, 2.1, 9.1 (oldest to newest).

Gordon has already beaten Sanders's 7 projection in 1 of his 5; Sanders has beaten Gordon's 7.6 in 1 of his 5.

At least 1 of these 5 games was played before the 2026 season.

Matchup

Ollie Gordon II (MIA) faces MIN, kickoff Sun, Oct 4, 4:05 PM ET. The matchup is rated tough. Betting line: implied team total 14.0, spread +10.5.

Raheim Sanders (CLE) faces PIT, kickoff Thu, Oct 1, 8:15 PM ET. The matchup is rated tough. Betting line: implied team total 18.0, spread +2.5.

What flips it

Gordon's edge is 0.6 points (7.6 to 7). Gordon's floor (3.6) sits under Sanders's projection, so a quiet game from Gordon flips it. Confidence in the call: moderate.

How to read these numbers →

More start/sit comparisons from this week's PPR projections. Open a pair for the call and the reasoning.