RB · New York Jets
Isaiah Davis
@ Chicago Bears · Week 4
- Line
- 5.5
- Rush Attempts
- Nuvela
- 4.8
- our projection
- Difference
- −0.7
- −13%
- Lines checked
- Markets posted
- 9 of 10
- Line since open
- 0, from 5.5
- Projections updated
All player props
Every line available this week, with how often he cleared it recently. Selecting one re-anchors the rest of the page.
Every market compared
| Market | Line | Nuvela | Diff | Cleared L5 | Opened | Since open |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anytime TD | 26% | 14% | −12% | 1 of 5 | 25% | +1% |
| Rushing Yards | 21.5 | 23.3 | +1.8 | 1 of 5 | 21.5 | level |
| Rush Attempts | 5.5 | 4.7 | −0.8 | 1 of 5 | 5.5 | level |
| Rush + Rec Yards | 33.5 | 35.8 | +2.3 | 2 of 5 | 34 | −0.5 |
| Receptions | 1.5 | 1.4 | −0.1 | 1 of 5 | 1.5 | level |
| Receiving Yards | 9.5 | 12.5 | +3 | 1 of 5 | 9.5 | level |
| 1st TD | 7% | 0% | −7% | 0 of 5 | 6% | +1% |
| 2+ TDs | 4% | 0% | −4% | 0 of 5 | — | — |
| Last TD | 7% | 0% | −7% | 0 of 5 | 7% | level |
| Longest Rush | No line posted yet | |||||
How the line moved
- Thu 4:00 PM5.5opened
- Fri 10:01 AM5.50
Opened 5.5, now 5.5.
Catalysts are matched to each move by timing, which is approximate — read them as what was in the news around the move, not a proven cause.
Moves with this
How the RB1's rushing tends to move with each teammate role, across the league.
- The QB's passing yardsroughly independent · 642 games−0.1
- The WR1's receiving yardsroughly independent · 642 games−0.1
- The WR2's receiving yardsroughly independent · 642 games−0.1
- The TE1's receiving yardsroughly independent · 640 games0
A role-level tendency across the league — a general pattern for this role, not a measured link between these two specific players.
Recent output relative to line
Full season · every game against the selected line.
Rush Attempts, last 2
- Consensus line
- 5.5
- carries
- Nuvela projection
- 4.8
- −0.7 on the line
- Above the line
- 0 of 2
- 0% of the sample
- vs closing lines
- —
- no closing lines
- Median
- 0
- regular season
- Average
- 0
- −5.5 on the line
Distribution by time window
The same games cut four ways, against the line posted now and against the line each game actually closed at.
Windows
| Window | Median | Above % · vs current line | Above % · vs closing line |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 3 | 0 | 0%0/2 | —— |
| Last 5 | 1.5 | 0%0/4 | 0%0/1 |
| Season | 0 | 0%0/2 | —— |
| Last season | 2 | 13%2/16 | 14%1/7 |
Custom splits
Cut the same games by where they were played, who was on the field, and what the game was doing.
Cut the sample
- Games
- 2
- of 3
- Average
- 0
- carries
- Median
- 0
- carries
- Above 5.5
- 0 of 2
- 0% of the sample
- vs the full 3
- 0
- carries
Sample under 8 games — treat as directional.
| Week | Opponent | Rush Attempts | Line that week | Against it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 2 | vs GB | 0 | — | — |
| Week 3 | @ DET | 0 | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — |
Availability
Practice participation through the week, and the teammates whose status changes his workload.
His practice week
- Injury
- None reported
- Game status
- Active
- Snap share, last game
- 0%
- Games missed this season
- 0
Workload dependencies
- Breece Hall73% of the backfield carries · Shares his room — every snap here is one out of his own carries.
- Braelon Allen27% of the backfield carries · Shares his room — every snap here is one out of his own carries.
- Arian SmithWR · leg · Draws coverage — his status changes how the defense sets up.Ir
- Omar Cooper Jr.WR · Draws coverage — his status changes how the defense sets up.Ir
- Tim PatrickWR · Draws coverage — his status changes how the defense sets up.Ir
Injury report
Both clubs’ full report, not only the names that touch his own workload.
NYJ · New York Jets
CHI · Chicago Bears
What this report suggests
- Names listed
- 7
- 4 NYJ · 3 CHI
- Ruled out
- 7
- won’t play
- Questionable
- 0
- Touch his workload
- 3
- Arian Smith, Omar Cooper Jr. +1
- His coverage
- —
- not tracked yet
3 names on these lists reach him directly. Arian Smith, Omar Cooper Jr. +1 — flagged in Availability — are the teammates whose status changes his own workload. The rest reach him through the game, not his role.
Across both clubs, 7 ruled out and 0 questionable. A thinner defence argues for more possessions — volume, which is most of a yards prop — though it cuts both ways, since trailing throws more and leading throws less.
Counted from the two lists above rather than typed, so this can’t disagree with them. It reads the report; it does not predict who plays.
Key research points
What this line assumes, and what the data shows. You make the call.
The read
The market lists Isaiah Davis at 5.5 rush attempts. He has cleared this line in 0 of 2 games. Our projection, built from his own games and never from the line, is 4.77. CHI ranks 29th of 32 in yards per carry allowed and 9th in carries faced. Research, not a pick — the call is yours.
Written by rule from this page’s own numbers — no model wrote it, and it adds nothing the tables below do not already carry.
Research context for this week
The factors actually in play this week, and which one swings it.
3 factors in play
Written by rule from this page’s own numbers — no model wrote it.
Game context
The game the line sits inside. A total and a script set how many chances there are before any of his own rates matter.
- Game total
- 43
- combined
- NYJ implied total
- 19.75
- underdog
- CHI implied total
- 23.25
- favored
- Projected script
- Neutral/Trail
- underdog
- Pace
- 31.9s
- seconds / play
- Wind
- —
- no forecast yet
- Conditions
- Outdoor
- outdoor
What the game projects
- Offensive plays
- 64.7
- 3-game avg
- Dropbacks
- 39.7
- 61% pass
- Red-zone trips
- 3
- 3-game avg
- Pass rate ± exp
- −1.3
- PROE
A yards prop is a rate times a volume. The rates live in Usage; this is the volume they act on — the offence’s per-game workload and his projected share of it.
Usage & opportunity
Roughly 70% of any prop outcome is opportunity, not efficiency. This is the section that predicts.
Share of the offence
Opponent defense
How Chicago Bears defends each position — fantasy points allowed per game, rank 1 = toughest — and what comparable roles have done against them.
How this defense handles the run
What Chicago Bears actually allows to RBs, against the rest of the league. Rank 1 = toughest draw.
| Measure | Allowed | League avg | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carries facedRushing volume this defence sees. | 19.7 | 22.2 | 9th of 32 |
| Rushing yards allowedPer game, to running backs. | 95.3 | 91.6 | 17th of 32 |
| Yards per carry allowedEfficiency conceded. | 4.8 | 4.1 | 29th of 32 |
| Runs stopped at or behind the lineShare of carries gaining nothing — the floor-killer for a rushing prop. | 14% | 16% | 19th of 32 |
| Runs of 10+ yards allowedShare of carries breaking 10 yards — where a rushing line's ceiling comes from. | 13% | 10% | 24th of 32 |
| Loaded boxes (8+ defenders)Share of carries this defence met with a loaded box. | 25% | 22% | 10th of 32 |
By position
| Position | FP allowed / g | Rank1 = toughest |
|---|---|---|
| QB | 16.9 | 16th of 32 |
| RBhis position | 19.7 | 15th of 32 |
| WR | 26.8 | 7th of 32 |
| TE | 8.3 | 7th of 32 |
Similar players
| Player | Carries |
|---|---|
| Ashton Jeanty2025 · Wk 4 | 21 |
| Christian McCaffrey2025 · Wk 17 | 23 |
| Alvin Kamara2025 · Wk 7 | 11 |
| Aaron Jones2026 · Wk 2 | 23 |
| Saquon Barkley2026 · Wk 3 | 15 |
Game log · season
Most recent first — his weekly output for this market.
Every game
| Week | Opponent | Carries | Rush yds | YPC | Long | Rec | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 3 | @ DET | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 |
| Wk 2 | vs GB | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 |
Prop odds
Over/under prices across the market for the selected line.
Rush Attempts
| Sportsbook | Line | Over | Under |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fanatics | 5.5 | +115 | −155 |
Odds aggregated from licensed US sportsbooks via The Odds API, shown for research only. Nuvela does not accept bets and is not affiliated with any sportsbook.