WR · New England Patriots
Kyle Williams
@ Buffalo Bills · Week 4
- Line
- 1%
- 2+ TDs
- Nuvela
- 0%
- our projection
- Difference
- −1%
- Lines checked
- Markets posted
- 6 of 8
- Line since open
- 0, from 1.5
- Projections updated
All player props
Every line available this week, with how often he cleared it recently. Selecting one re-anchors the rest of the page.
Every market compared
| Market | Line | Nuvela | Diff | Cleared L5 | Opened | Since open |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Receiving Yards | 12.5 | 18.7 | +6.2 | 2 of 5 | 12.5 | level |
| Receptions | 0.5 | 1.1 | +0.6 | 3 of 5 | 0.5 | level |
| Anytime TD | 13% | 20% | +8% | 0 of 5 | 13% | 0% |
| 1st TD | 2% | 0% | −2% | 0 of 5 | 2% | level |
| 2+ TDs | 1% | 0% | −1% | 0 of 5 | — | — |
| Last TD | 3% | 0% | −3% | 0 of 5 | 4% | 0% |
| Longest Reception | No line posted yet | |||||
| Rush + Rec Yards | No line posted yet | |||||
How the line moved
- Mon 10:01 AM1.5opened
- Sat 3:01 PM1.50
Opened 1.5, now 1.5.
Catalysts are matched to each move by timing, which is approximate — read them as what was in the news around the move, not a proven cause.
Moves with this
We don’t have enough same-game history yet to publish which of this game’s other markets tend to move with this one. For now, treat correlated legs with care.
Recent output relative to line
Full season · every game against the selected line.
2+ TDs, last 3
- Consensus line
- 1.5
- Nuvela projection
- 0%
- −1.5 on the line
- Above the line
- 0 of 3
- 0% of the sample
- vs closing lines
- 0 of 3
- each week's own close
- Median
- 0
- regular season
- Average
- 0
- −1.5 on the line
Distribution by time window
The same games cut four ways, against the line posted now and against the line each game actually closed at.
Windows
| Window | Median | Above % · vs current line | Above % · vs closing line |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 3 | 0 | 0%0/3 | 0%0/3 |
| Last 5 | 0 | 0%0/3 | 0%0/3 |
| Season | 0 | 0%0/3 | 0%0/3 |
| Last season | 0 | 0%0/14 | 0%0/14 |
Custom splits
Cut the same games by where they were played, who was on the field, and what the game was doing.
Cut the sample
- Games
- 3
- of 3
- Average
- 0
- Median
- 0
- Above 1.5
- 0 of 3
- 0% of the sample
- vs the full 3
- 0
Sample under 8 games — treat as directional.
| Week | Opponent | 2+ TDs | Line that week | Against it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 1 | @ SEA | 0 | 1.5 | −1.5 |
| Week 2 | vs PIT | 0 | 1.5 | −1.5 |
| Week 3 | @ JAX | 0 | 1.5 | −1.5 |
Availability
Practice participation through the week, and the teammates whose status changes his workload.
His practice week
- Injury
- None reported
- Game status
- Active
- Snap share, last game
- 35%
- Games missed this season
- 0
Workload dependencies
- Mack Hollins72% snap share · Shares his room — every snap here is one out of his own targets.
- DeMario Douglas56% snap share · Shares his room — every snap here is one out of his own targets.
- Romeo Doubs65% snap share · Shares his room — every snap here is one out of his own targets.
- A.J. Brown44% snap share · Shares his room — every snap here is one out of his own targets.
- Efton Chism III22% snap share · Shares his room — every snap here is one out of his own targets.
- Julian HillTE · Draws coverage — his status changes how the defense sets up.Ir
Injury report
Both clubs’ full report, not only the names that touch his own workload.
NE · New England Patriots
BUF · Buffalo Bills
What this report suggests
- Names listed
- 6
- 4 NE · 2 BUF
- Ruled out
- 6
- won’t play
- Questionable
- 0
- Touch his workload
- 1
- Julian Hill
- His coverage
- —
- not tracked yet
1 name on these lists reach him directly. Julian Hill — flagged in Availability — is the teammate whose status changes his own workload. The rest reach him through the game, not his role.
Across both clubs, 6 ruled out and 0 questionable. A thinner defence argues for more possessions — volume, which is most of a yards prop — though it cuts both ways, since trailing throws more and leading throws less.
Counted from the two lists above rather than typed, so this can’t disagree with them. It reads the report; it does not predict who plays.
Key research points
What this line assumes, and what the data shows. You make the call.
The read
The market lists Kyle Williams at 1.5 2+ TDs. He has cleared this line in 0 of 3 games. Our projection, built from his own games and never from the line, is 0.0. BUF ranks 31st of 32 in receiving yards allowed and 28th in targets allowed. Research, not a pick — the call is yours.
Written by rule from this page’s own numbers — no model wrote it, and it adds nothing the tables below do not already carry.
Research context for this week
The factors actually in play this week, and which one swings it.
3 factors in play
Written by rule from this page’s own numbers — no model wrote it.
Game context
The game the line sits inside. A total and a script set how many chances there are before any of his own rates matter.
- Game total
- 50
- combined
- NE implied total
- 21.5
- underdog
- BUF implied total
- 28.5
- favored
- Projected script
- Neutral/Trail
- underdog
- Pace
- 30.6s
- seconds / play
- Wind
- —
- no forecast yet
- Conditions
- Outdoor
- outdoor
What the game projects
- Offensive plays
- 59.3
- 3-game avg
- Dropbacks
- 35.2
- 59% pass
- Red-zone trips
- 2.3
- 3-game avg
- Pass rate ± exp
- −1.9
- PROE
A yards prop is a rate times a volume. The rates live in Usage; this is the volume they act on — the offence’s per-game workload and his projected share of it.
Usage & opportunity
Roughly 70% of any prop outcome is opportunity, not efficiency. This is the section that predicts.
Share of the offence
Opponent defense
How Buffalo Bills defends each position — fantasy points allowed per game, rank 1 = toughest — and what comparable roles have done against them.
How this defense handles receivers
What Buffalo Bills actually allows to WRs, against the rest of the league. Rank 1 = toughest draw.
| Measure | Allowed | League avg | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Targets allowedTo this position, per game — the volume a receptions line rests on. | 20.7 | 18.1 | 28th of 32 |
| Catch rate allowedReceptions per target. | 65% | 63% | 22nd of 32 |
| Receiving yards allowedTo this position. | 192 | 149.3 | 31st of 32 |
| Yards per target allowedVolume-independent efficiency conceded to this position. | 9.3 | 8.3 | 25th of 32 |
| Target depth allowedAverage air yards per target — how far downfield this defence lets the ball go. | 12.1 | 11.4 | 22nd of 32 |
| Yards after catch allowedPer reception — tackling and pursuit, the other half of a receiving line. | 4.5 | 4.2 | 23rd of 32 |
| Deep attempts allowedShare of throws against this defence travelling 20+ air yards. | 11% | 11% | 19th of 32 |
By position
| Position | FP allowed / g | Rank1 = toughest |
|---|---|---|
| QB | 19.7 | 25th of 32 |
| RB | 27.5 | 27th of 32 |
| WRhis position | 38.8 | 28th of 32 |
| TE | 10.5 | 10th of 32 |
Similar players
| Player | Value |
|---|---|
| Ja'Marr Chase2025 · Wk 14 | — |
| Drake London2025 · Wk 6 | — |
| Jameson Williams2026 · Wk 2 | — |
| Tyler Johnson2025 · Wk 2 | — |
| Amon-Ra St. Brown2026 · Wk 2 | — |
Game log · season
Most recent first — his weekly output for this market.
Every game
| Week | Opponent | Targets | Rec | Rec yds | Long | aDOT | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 3 | @ JAX | 3 | 1 | 34 | 34 | — | 0 |
| Wk 2 | vs PIT | 2 | 1 | 10 | 10 | — | 0 |
| Wk 1 | @ SEA | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 |
Prop odds
Over/under prices across the market for the selected line.
2+ TDs
| Sportsbook | Line | Over | Under |
|---|---|---|---|
| BetMGM | 2.5 | +6000 | — |
| BetOnline | 0.5 | +5900 | — |
| BetRivers | 1.5 | +7500 | — |
| Bovada | 1.5 | +9000 | — |
| DraftKings | 1.5 | +25000 | — |
| Fanatics | 1.5 | +40000 | — |
| FanDuel | 1.5 | +12500 | — |
| Caesars | 1.5 | +8500 | — |
Odds aggregated from licensed US sportsbooks via The Odds API, shown for research only. Nuvela does not accept bets and is not affiliated with any sportsbook.