WR · Jacksonville Jaguars
Parker Washington
@ Cincinnati Bengals · Week 4
- Line
- 73.5
- Receiving Yards
- Nuvela
- 66.5
- our projection
- Difference
- −7
- −10%
- Lines checked
- Markets posted
- 7 of 8
- Line since open
- 0, from 73.5
- Projections updated
All player props
Every line available this week, with how often he cleared it recently. Selecting one re-anchors the rest of the page.
Every market compared
| Market | Line | Nuvela | Diff | Cleared L5 | Opened | Since open |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Receiving Yards | 73.5 | 71.4 | −2.1 | 4 of 5 | 73.5 | level |
| Receptions | 5.5 | 4.4 | −1.1 | 2 of 5 | 5.5 | level |
| Anytime TD | 41% | 55% | +14% | 3 of 5 | 40% | +1% |
| Longest Reception | 25.5 | 28.4 | +2.9 | 4 of 5 | 25.5 | level |
| 1st TD | 9% | 28% | +19% | 1 of 5 | 9% | level |
| 2+ TDs | 2% | 0% | −2% | 0 of 5 | — | — |
| Last TD | 11% | 3% | −7% | 0 of 5 | 10% | +1% |
| Rush + Rec Yards | No line posted yet | |||||
How the line moved
- Mon 9:58 PM73.5opened
- Mon 10:02 PM70.5−3
- Mon 10:02 PM73.5+3
- Tue 8:02 PM72.5−1
- Thu 9:59 AM74.5+2
- Thu 4:00 PM73.5−1
Opened 73.5, now 73.5.
Catalysts are matched to each move by timing, which is approximate — read them as what was in the news around the move, not a proven cause.
Moves with this
How the WR1's receiving tends to move with each teammate role, across the league.
- The QB's passing yardsmove together · 642 games+0.6
- The WR2's receiving yardsmove loosely together · 642 games+0.2
- The RB1's rushing yardsroughly independent · 642 games0
- The TE1's receiving yardsroughly independent · 640 games0
A role-level tendency across the league — a general pattern for this role, not a measured link between these two specific players.
Recent output relative to line
Full season · every game against the selected line.
Receiving Yards, last 3
- Consensus line
- 73.5
- yards
- Nuvela projection
- 66.5
- −7 on the line
- Above the line
- 2 of 3
- 67% of the sample
- vs closing lines
- 2 of 3
- each week's own close
- Median
- 83
- regular season
- Average
- 73.7
- +0.2 on the line
Distribution by time window
The same games cut four ways, against the line posted now and against the line each game actually closed at.
Windows
| Window | Median | Above % · vs current line | Above % · vs closing line |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 3 | 83 | 67%2/3 | 67%2/3 |
| Last 5 | 87 | 80%4/5 | 80%4/5 |
| Season | 83 | 67%2/3 | 67%2/3 |
| Last season | 43 | 31%5/16 | 67%10/15 |
Custom splits
Cut the same games by where they were played, who was on the field, and what the game was doing.
Cut the sample
- Games
- 3
- of 3
- Average
- 73.7
- yards
- Median
- 83
- yards
- Above 73.5
- 2 of 3
- 67% of the sample
- vs the full 3
- 0
- yards
Sample under 8 games — treat as directional.
| Week | Opponent | Receiving Yards | Line that week | Against it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 1 | vs CLE | 83 | 53.5 | +29.5 |
| Week 2 | @ DEN | 98 | 59.5 | +38.5 |
| Week 3 | vs NE | 40 | 70.5 | −30.5 |
Availability
Practice participation through the week, and the teammates whose status changes his workload.
His practice week
- Injury
- None reported
- Game status
- Active
- Snap share, last game
- 81%
- Games missed this season
- 0
Workload dependencies
- Brian Thomas Jr.42% snap share · Shares his room — every snap here is one out of his own targets.
- Jakobi Meyers79% snap share · Shares his room — every snap here is one out of his own targets.
- Josh Cameron29% snap share · Shares his room — every snap here is one out of his own targets.
- LeQuint Allen Jr.RB · leg · Draws coverage — his status changes how the defense sets up.Questionable
- Nate BoerkircherTE · other · Draws coverage — his status changes how the defense sets up.Questionable
Injury report
Both clubs’ full report, not only the names that touch his own workload.
JAX · Jacksonville Jaguars
CIN · Cincinnati Bengals
What this report suggests
- Names listed
- 16
- 7 JAX · 9 CIN
- Ruled out
- 3
- won’t play
- Questionable
- 13
- decided at kickoff
- Touch his workload
- 2
- LeQuint Allen Jr., Nate Boerkircher
- His coverage
- —
- not tracked yet
2 names on these lists reach him directly. LeQuint Allen Jr., Nate Boerkircher — flagged in Availability — are the teammates whose status changes his own workload. The rest reach him through the game, not his role.
Across both clubs, 3 ruled out and 13 questionable. A thinner defence argues for more possessions — volume, which is most of a yards prop — though it cuts both ways, since trailing throws more and leading throws less.
Counted from the two lists above rather than typed, so this can’t disagree with them. It reads the report; it does not predict who plays.
Key research points
What this line assumes, and what the data shows. You make the call.
The read
The market lists Parker Washington at 73.5 receiving yards. He has cleared this line in 2 of 3 games. Our projection, built from his own games and never from the line, is 66.49. CIN ranks 3rd of 32 in catch rate allowed and 7th in yards per target allowed. Research, not a pick — the call is yours.
Written by rule from this page’s own numbers — no model wrote it, and it adds nothing the tables below do not already carry.
Research context for this week
The factors actually in play this week, and which one swings it.
3 factors in play
Written by rule from this page’s own numbers — no model wrote it.
Game context
The game the line sits inside. A total and a script set how many chances there are before any of his own rates matter.
- Game total
- 51.5
- combined
- JAX implied total
- 24.5
- underdog
- CIN implied total
- 27
- favored
- Projected script
- Close
- tight spread
- Pace
- 34.1s
- seconds / play
- Wind
- —
- no forecast yet
- Conditions
- Outdoor
- outdoor
What the game projects
- Offensive plays
- 55.7
- 3-game avg
- Dropbacks
- 28.6
- 51% pass
- His receptions
- 5
- projected this game
- Red-zone trips
- 3
- 3-game avg
- Pass rate ± exp
- −4.5
- PROE
A yards prop is a rate times a volume. The rates live in Usage; this is the volume they act on — the offence’s per-game workload and his projected share of it.
Usage & opportunity
Roughly 70% of any prop outcome is opportunity, not efficiency. This is the section that predicts.
Share of the offence
Opponent defense
How Cincinnati Bengals defends each position — fantasy points allowed per game, rank 1 = toughest — and what comparable roles have done against them.
How this defense handles receivers
What Cincinnati Bengals actually allows to WRs, against the rest of the league. Rank 1 = toughest draw.
| Measure | Allowed | League avg | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Targets allowedTo this position, per game — the volume a receptions line rests on. | 19.3 | 18.1 | 25th of 32 |
| Catch rate allowedReceptions per target. | 53% | 63% | 3rd of 32 |
| Receiving yards allowedTo this position. | 140.3 | 148.3 | 14th of 32 |
| Yards per target allowedVolume-independent efficiency conceded to this position. | 7.3 | 8.2 | 7th of 32 |
| Target depth allowedAverage air yards per target — how far downfield this defence lets the ball go. | 12.1 | 11.4 | 21st of 32 |
| Yards after catch allowedPer reception — tackling and pursuit, the other half of a receiving line. | 3.7 | 4.1 | 11th of 32 |
| Deep attempts allowedShare of throws against this defence travelling 20+ air yards. | 13% | 11% | 24th of 32 |
By position
| Position | FP allowed / g | Rank1 = toughest |
|---|---|---|
| QB | 17.1 | 18th of 32 |
| RB | 18.9 | 13th of 32 |
| WRhis position | 30.8 | 14th of 32 |
| TE | 17.7 | 28th of 32 |
Similar players
| Player | Rec yds |
|---|---|
| Rome Odunze2025 · Wk 9 | 0 |
| DK Metcalf2026 · Wk 3 | 31 |
| Brian Thomas Jr.2025 · Wk 2 | 49 |
| Jerry Jeudy2025 · Wk 18 | 17 |
| Emeka Egbuka2026 · Wk 1 | 63 |
Game log · season
Most recent first — his weekly output for this market.
Every game
| Week | Opponent | Targets | Rec | Rec yds | Long | aDOT | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 3 | vs NE | 5 | 3 | 40 | 18 | 12 | 1 |
| Wk 2 | @ DEN | 12 | 7 | 98 | 32 | 13.1 | 0 |
| Wk 1 | vs CLE | 6 | 5 | 83 | 30 | 16.9 | 1 |
Prop odds
Over/under prices across the market for the selected line.
Receiving Yards
| Sportsbook | Line | Over | Under |
|---|---|---|---|
| BetMGM | 76.5 | −115 | −115 |
| BetOnline | 73.5 | −111 | −116 |
| BetRivers | 74.5 | −114 | −117 |
| Bovada | 73.5 | −115 | −115 |
| DraftKings | 73.5 | −112 | −112 |
| Fanatics | 70.5 | −125 | −105 |
| FanDuel | 73.5 | −114 | −114 |
Odds aggregated from licensed US sportsbooks via The Odds API, shown for research only. Nuvela does not accept bets and is not affiliated with any sportsbook.